Hello Mark, I cannot say that I understand this to be possible. However, if it is and it produces electrical energy (at least one of the machines seems to work as a generator - producing electricity) then whatever mechanical energy driving the shaft can be replaced with a electrical motor driven by the generated electricity. Even if it requires some rectifier - inverter - transformer, a COP of 2.5 would still after losses in the transformation have at least COP >2 left. At 20 kVA that would handle all my needs:)
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:58 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: > Hi Vorts, > > > > I think all us old-timers will remember the name ‘Tewari’… > > > > Seems he’s made some good progress… > > > > RECENT TESTS > > A Breakthrough occurred on Saturday November 23rd, 2014 with a test that > yielded an efficiency of 238% at 6 KVA for a 3 phase AC synchronous > generator, 50/60 Hz, 240 VAC. A major manufacturer of AC Generators in > India has duplicated the machine and reported an efficiency of 250% at 20 > KVA” > > http://www.tewari.org/test-results/ > > > > But also found this statement… > > > > “Each machine can produce at least 2.38 times the input and can be > configured in a self-running mode. > > Due to concentration on efficiency and design improvements the machine has > not yet been configured in this manner.” > > > http://nowsolarwa.blogspot.com/2015/04/breaking-news-over-unity-reactionless.html > > > > Hmmm, hasn’t, or can’t, close the loop to actually prove OUO… > > -mark iverson > > >
