The 47-hour live test by the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project on their Glow reactor has shown (apparent) excess heat - not conclusive but interesting, since there is also a growing divergence between the fueled and unfueled reactors, which is increasing during the run. Exactly what is expected of a gainful situation.
The conclusion of a thermal anomaly is to be furthered by a "post-test calibration run". "planned where there will be a run with the hydrogen removed from the fueled reactor. The data from that post-test will be as important as the data from the fueled test." COMMENT: HUGE POTENTIAL MISTAKE! . yet of course, if the gain does not continue, then there is no mistake but . there is the likelihood that some gain will continue. The post calibration test can be deceptive, and in fact the interpretation of those results will be extremely counterproductive - in the likely circumstance that reduced but still anomalous thermal gain continues. If this reaction depends on a population of fractional hydrogen or f/H - which is "below ground state hydrogen" often called the hydrino state, and which is a very strong contender for the gain which is witnessed - then that active material will remain in the reactor after pumping away H2. It will have become magnetically bound to the nickel- even when all the gaseous hydrogen is removed from the reactor. Thus, thermal gain will continue - which will lead MFMP to assume that their calibration was in error - when in fact the error is simply in the assumption that eliminating hydrogen gas will de-fuel the reactor. IT WILL NOT to the extent that f/H is involved. Of course, if the gain disappears after degassing, then f/H was not involved in the anomaly and this reinforces their original conclusion, and also eliminates f/H as the active element. Jones
