How many counter examples to your hypothesis do you need before you at least admit there may be more than one cause of dying coral reefs?
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 12:56 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > How many dead fish do we have to have and dead birds falling from the sky > to have before you sparkies understand your mistake? > > http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/01/12/florida-2/ > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:48 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > >> The radar RF signal is not being rectified by the water into a DC >> current like your chart is assuming. The signal is actually reflected from >> the surface layers with extremely small penetration. The pulse rate has >> nothing to do with the high frequency RF reflection behavior for a typical >> installation. >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> >> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2015 9:50 am >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Possible cause for coral reefs dying... >> >> Low frequency pulse. >> >> Also, we are not communicating with the marine life and coral reef, the >> evidence is mounting that 2 terrawatts of effective isotropic radiated >> power (EIRP) in a local area scattered by the overhead atmosphere is mildly >> shocking the marine life through electromagnetic induction and conduction >> through the salt water near the surface as it "grounds out" into the ocean. >> You can't fool mother nature sort of thing. >> >> Here is a model of induced electrical currents in seawater surface >> around just one ship's antennas. Now imagine 27 high power coastal based >> radars/antennas and 45 warship radars/antennas in one area. >> >> >> http://darkmattersalot.com/2015/05/14/how-cousteau-and-noaa-killed-the-reef/ >> >> >> Effects of Electrical Current* on the Body [3] >> <http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2002-123/2002-123f.html#end3> *Current* >> *Reaction* 1 milliamp Just a faint tingle. 5 milliamps Slight shock >> felt. Disturbing, but not painful. Most people can “let go.” However, >> strong involuntary movements can cause injuries. 6-25 milliamps (women)† >> 9-30 milliamps (men) Painful shock. Muscular control is lost. This is >> the range where “freezing currents” start. It may not be possible to “let >> go.” 50-150 milliamps Extremely painful shock, respiratory arrest >> (breathing stops), severe muscle contractions. Flexor muscles may cause >> holding on; extensor muscles may cause intense pushing away. Death is >> possible. 1,000-4,300 milliamps (1-4.3 amps) Ventricular fibrillation >> (heart pumping action not rhythmic) occurs. Muscles contract; nerve damage >> occurs. Death is likely. 10,000 milliamps (10 amps) Cardiac arrest and >> severe burns occur. Death is probable. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Low pulsed frequency is a contradiction in terms. >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 7:01 AM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Except low pulsed frequencies >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, July 7, 2015, James Bowery < jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:42 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint < >>>>> zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> This is primarily meant for fellow Vort, ChemEng (Stewart), but >>>>>> some others may have an interest… >>>>>> >>>>>> Stewart, I think I may have a cause for your hypothesis re: a link >>>>>> between our modern radar systems and the dying of coral reefs… >>>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>>> Time to break out the tin-foil hats??? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No need. Salt water shields against EM penetration. >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
