The new particle, Weyl Fermions is a Quasiparticle. It does not exist as a seperate particle. The electron is made up of a number of properties that can be seperated out and expressed in interactions with condensed matter. This special crystal stucture where the Weyl was found does that seperation. Since the Weyl Fermion is massless and exists at the speed of light, this implies that certain electron properties produce mass by interacting with the higgs field.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote: > The coupling of fermions via spin with nucleons to allow mass conversion > may require many coherent ferimons to improve the odds that spin, angular > momentum charge and mass can be conserved. A special nano structure with > a varying magnetic field and resonant temperature conditions (lattice > vibrations) may be what is necessary. > > At least that is what seems generally involved in reported test > parameters in Pd and Ni systems. > > The LENR reaction parameters are not the same as appear to control > particles with significant kinetic energy and linear momentum where mass is > changed to energy. IMHO the coherent nano systems must couple in a > different manner than occurs in particle collision reactions. Free high > energy entities do not seem to happen very often because the multi-body > system is not configured properly most of the time. > > Bob Cook > > ppen in > > -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene > Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 6:44 AM > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: Rossi's theory of the LENR reaction > > Sounds a bit like a new type of fermionm > > > http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/semiconductors/materials/exotic-particles > -could-lead-to-faster-electronics > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: mix...@bigpond.com > > > In reply to Eric Walker's message of Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:58:49 -0500: > Hi, > [snip] > >> Now I wonder whether it would be possible to conserve spin with the >> appropriate selection of electrons: >> >> -1/2 + 1/2 + -1/2 + 1/2 + ... + 1/2 + 1/2 = 1 >> >> Each electron will in turn emit a photon, which is again angular >> momentum n=1, so I'm not sure how that factors in as a consideration. >> >> It seems improbable to me that there would be two [dd]* resonances with >> antiparallel spin underway at the same time. >> > > This is an interesting idea, but again the question arises, why doesn't > this > happen with normal decay reactions? > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
