Jobs required to create, support and run the internet are the vast majority? To make tablets and software? Laugh!
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:44 PM, leaking pen <itsat...@gmail.com> wrote: > blaze, if not for the overhead eating efficiency created by mass building, > those things wouldn't exist. and the jobs you are describing are a SMALL > fraction of the jobs available, and the ones Joe is listing the vast > MAJORITY. > > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> No, any sort of job that increases communication and education I don't >> see as generally planet wrecking, though certainly we could do a lot >> better. I'm talking about the excess energy consumption, cars, the >> houses, the yachts, the airplanes, the military to protect all this, etc >> etc. >> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Joe Hughes <jhughe...@comcast.net> wrote: >> >>> So would you consider the jobs required to create, support and run the >>> internet, networks and infrastructure that this list runs on as bullsh*t >>> planet wrecking consumption? >>> How about the jobs to create and deliver the computer, tablet or mobile >>> device you use to post on this and all of the associated software required >>> to do that? >>> I'm not suggesting you were advocating that you were not a part of the >>> bullsh*t planet wrecking consumption - just questioning if in your mind >>> there were any other categories between safety, security, etc and bullsh*t >>> planet wrecking consumption. :) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 8/4/15 5:03 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: >>> >>>> it's all pretty much just useless bullsh*t planet wrecking consumption. >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
