Peter suggests that the 2 He4 formed from Li and maybe hydrogen reaction end up with significant kinetic energy, which is given up as heat to the system. This reaction, if correctly described as producing energetic particles, must heat a plasma or liquid and not result in any energetic EM measurable radiation.
If it occurred in solid with any key dimentional significance, the energetic He4’s would quickly destroy the geometry of significance—thus a plasma or a liquid metal is indicated. I have no good explantion of how the energetic He-4’s occur without some energetic measureable EM. I think the mass energy conversion of the Li H system avoids particles with high kinetic energy. Experiments regarding Be-8 decay and the type of EM observed when decay happens in a solid are pertinent to this issue IMHO. However it is not clear Be-8 is a player—it may only be a ghost. Bob Cook From: Peter Gluck Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:48 AM To: Arik El Boher ; Bo Hoistadt ; Brian Ahern ; CMNS ; Dagmar Kuhn ; David Daggett ; doug marker ; Dr. Braun Tibor ; eCatNews ; Gabriel Moagar-Poladian ; Gary ; Haiko Lietz ; jeff aries ; Mark Tsirlin ; Nicolaie N. Vlad ; Peter Bjorkbom ; Peter Mobberley ; Pierre Clauzon ; Roberto Germano ; Roy Virgilio ; Steve Katinski ; Sunwon Park ; Valerio Ciampoli ; vlad ; VORTEX Subject: [Vo]:the roles of Li, Ni, H and Al in the Rossi Effect Opera? See please: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/08/aug-27-2015swarm-of-questions-regarding.html changes and surprises' Should we forget the isotopic shifts from the Lugano experiment? Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
