>From e-cat world:

More Isotopic Analysis of MFMP Glowstick Fuel/Ash Published by Univ. of
Missouri Lab

http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/09/11/more-isotopic-analysis-of-mfmp-glowstic
k-fuelash-published-by-univ-of-missouri-lab/

"The basic message of the results is that, to the ability of our quadrupole
ICP-MS to measure, the Li isotope ratios are effectively the same in all
four samples that contain major amounts of Li" .. "Also, the Ni in all
samples appears to be isotopically natural."

Earlier, in the report of Jiang from China wrt his glowstick cell, NO
difference in the ratios for nickel isotopic ratios for samples before and
after experiment are seen. He states: "The results of isotopic analysis in
the Lugano report are completely different from ours." Jiang's ICPMS result
shows that lithum-6 "probably is an important reagent" with a 3% variation,
but nickel does not react, nor does Li-7. 

These two findings will be considered by Rossi's critics as more evidence
indicating that AR managed to "salt" the ash in Lugano by adding enriched
isotopes. Rossi had earlier admitted to having purchased enriched isotopes,
and Levi clearly states that Rossi had complete control over loading and
unloading the reactor. The huge enrichment level which turned up in Lugano
is not physically possible. Almost every physicist who has weighed-in on
this point agrees that a complete conversion of lithium isotopes, as
claimed, is non-physical. 

The motivation for taking this kind of risk was presumably either to throw
off potential competitors, or to favorably influence the patent office.
Rossi reportedly personally presented these isotopic results to the patent
examiner, according to a recent revelation. 

Rossi's numerous supporters will manage to minimalize this kind of cheating
as being standard procedure in capitalism, since Rossi owed no duty to the
public to present accurate findings, and if he had done so, the major
benefit would be to competing companies like BLP. Blacklight Power is a
company which is also trying to harness hydrogen reactions using lithium,
but has clearly indicated in patents that the source of excess heat is NOT
nuclear. By presenting evidence of massive isotopic changes in the Lugano
ash, Rossi may believe that he has nullified the claims of BLP. And make no
mistake: Randell Mills has been quoted on a forum, long before Rossi's new
patent surfaced, that lithium aluminum hydride is covered by his prior
patents. 

Given Mills' strong international patent portfolio and breadth of claims -
that is strong motivation for Rossi to try to make his case for a nuclear,
versus non-nuclear reaction.




Reply via email to