It is interesting to see Rossi distancing himself from the Ni isotopic fuel-to-ash shifts suggested by the Lugano experiment, and is instead focusing on the isotopic shift in the Li. It could be that he knew from the beginning that the 62Ni in the Lugano ash analysis was either error or he knew it was part of the fuel. Since in other comments he seems to be convinced of the value of 62Ni, the latter explanation may be more likely.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oct. 6, 2015 > > Interview With Andrea Rossi, LENR Energy Pioneer > > David H. Bailey, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab (retired) and University > of California, Davis > > Jonathan M. Borwein, Laureate Professor of Mathematics, University of > Newcastle, Australia > > > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-h-bailey/interview-with-andrea-ros_b_8248624.html >
