Yup it's certainly astonishing if true. If a Nucleon is disintegrating this way, I wonder how it still can meet conservation rules. In order to form pions it implies quark anti quark pairs with combinations of up and down quarks are formed from a nucleon. In effect the equivalent quarks for a anti nucleon need to be produced. If they interact with another nucleon I suppose they may change transfer energy to that nucleon and change the nucleon type and conserve spin etc somehow to maintain conservation states otherwise I suppose the conservation might be taken up by the kind of produced lepton and neutrinos produced. I'm curious how it can work I suppose we will need to wait to see the of their theory.
Sent from my iPad > On 23 okt. 2015, at 16:54, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > From: Stephen Cooke > > Ø That nucleons may actually disintegrate is nothing short of > astonishing! Is this what they are actually saying? Did they really observe > such huge amounts of energy? > > > Yes precisely. This is why it will be more controversial than cold fusion > until replicated. Many observers were left in a state of amazement, but … all > of this was in the prior papers. We talked about it here earlier. > > Sometimes you just have to hear it directly from a credible person instead of > seeing it in a paper. Ólafsson is a tall, handsome Nordic fellow - not as > charismatic as McKubre, but some of that comes with age. He is very > believable. > > Ø > > Ø 900 MeV is close to the rest mass of a neutron (939 MeV) and proton > (938 MeV), Half the mass of the Deutron Nucleus! > > > Yes – it is the entire mass of a nucleon which is being converted into > energy. I should not have rounded this off. Much of that energy will be lost > to neutrinos but there will be gammas. > > Ø > > Ø When they 900 MeV is released I see 3 possible meanings for this: > > > 1) Did they imply total disintegration of one of the nucleons to Pions > to Muons to electrons and neutrinos and gamma? > > > Yes. They see mesons first, then pions, then muons and finally electrons. > They have a detector. I think the skepticism from other Physicists will focus > on the detector. Ideally other detectors should be used as well. I hope the > slides will be published soon as this would require a lone time to try to > explain, otherwise. > > > 2) If so could it be the just the Neutron or Proton or either one that > can disintegrate? > > > Either one or both together. > > Ø > > Ø Which ever the case its astonishing amount of energy to release in > one reaction almost up there with matter antimatter annihilation. > > > If they can confirm this finding using a neutrino detector – that would go a > long way. I walked away from this with the feeling that a new door is opening > in the world of alternative energy. They may not have it completely right, > but this could represent the final hurdle in the process started in 1989 (or > earlier). > > It is too bad for mainstream physics that most of them have they missed the > boat on this. If Holmlid is accurate, it makes the billions spent on the LHC > and the Higgs closer to self-promoting fraud than to the efficient > advancement of science. Unlike the situation in 1989, it will be much harder > to erect obstacles. > > Let us hope that this is not a Pandora’s box which is opening. > > >
