Answer to #2 to #5 Info on tachyons is found in
The Inside Story: Quasilocal Tachyons and Black Holes Gary T. Horowitz and Eva Silverstein http://slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap/getdoc/slac-pub-11616.pdf Tachyons are big in string theory and Horowits is one of the biggest string guys around. The first thing that happens is the generation of an analog micro black hole(MBH). That takes about 1,000,000 GeV of energy accumulation. Then the MBH must expel all that positive energy by hawking radiation to produce a tachyon witch is all negative vacuum energy. When a tachyon is formed, the SPP goes dormant. When laser energy is received, that energy must be expelled to keep the tachyon in the null energy state(all negative vacuum energy) so a glueball is formed(Kion) and moves out to the far field. An equal amount of negative energy is added to the tachyon to balance the vacuum energy equation. The fully formed tachyon is a bubble of negative vacuum energy. LENR experiments show that this tachyon can survive for a long time and might be the cause of "life after death". Photos that show tachon paths take days to setup and expose. When a bose condensate of these tachyons form, it takes a lot of energy to form a trillion of them at 1,000,000 GeV a copy. All the tachyons would be in the same energy state since they are all alike. Holmlid says that he sees 10 billion kions produced by that condensate. The condensate should have more tachyons in the condensate than the number of Kions produced. It must take a long time to construct that tachyon condensate and its creation needs a lot of energy. The tachyons expel energy through entanglement (Hawking radiation). It is this negative energy field that blocks gamma rays and neutron emissions. The nuclear reactions producing radiation go backward in time where radiation does not exist. I would like to know how far that entanglement field extends away from the tachyon condensate. Holmlid should place a radioactive isotope at graduated distances from the condensate and find out when it stabilization does not occur. Or if the stabilization is a gradual or an abrupt process. There are three mechanisms that produce nuclear activity in the SPP: entanglement, magnetism, particle production. Entanglement and particle production go hand and hand. Magnetism is a separate mechanism and will exist before the other two become established. Without entanglement, gamma and neutron emission will occur. Magnetism can produce nuclear reactions on its own before the tachyon is established. This is how LENR produces neutrons and gamma at startup and cooldown when entanglement breaks down or is not setup yet. On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Answer to #1 > > A detailed exposition on the production of Rydberg matter is found in the > following: > > *Conditions for forming Rydberg matter: condensation* > *of Rydberg states in the gas phase versus at surfaces * > > The science of RM formation seems to be a large sub branch of chemistry. > It is not easy to create RM of detect it. > > There are 51 references which means that it will take time to get up to > speed as a RM creation guru. > > The study of RM will take a course of two in the future masters program on > LENR. > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Stephen Cooke < > stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Axil >> >> I have a few questions about Rydberg Matter and SPP that maybe you know >> the answer to: >> >> 1. I understand that Hydrogen is stored in much higher densities in the >> catalyst material than can even in its liquid form? How does the density of >> the atoms (e.g. Hydrogen) compare to the density of Hydrogen once it is >> absorbed in the catalyst? I suppose it is stored in the catalyst in >> monatomic form to avoid Covalent bond length constraints. I appreciate it >> might be a difficult answer due to the 2D structure of the Rydberg matter >> crystals. I'm wondering if it is release from such material in a >> constrained environment if it has no choice but to form Rydberg matter. >> >> 2. I understand that according to Holmlids experiment and some others it >> takes some time to prepare the material. I understood that this might be to >> prepare the material either to generate the right surface conditions to >> form Rydberg Matter, to absorb sufficient Hydrogen in to catalyst or to >> produce sufficient quantities of Rydberg matter it self. Is this you >> understanding or are you also suggesting that maybe the time is also to >> Energise the SPP somehow? If so would this have transport implications due >> to stability or would we assume the matter is kept in one place during the >> charging and eventual test? >> >> 3. Once an SPP is formed can it sustain itself for long periods of time… >> what limits this is there a limit to the rate it can generate IR radiation >> or evaporate through Hadronisation for example? >> >> 4. What is the maximum energy that can be contained in one SPP. Would it >> be sufficient for Hadronisation? Or would it act in some way to catalyse >> some how the Hadronisation process? >> >> 5. If and SPP is slowly generated would it spontaneously Hadronise, >> radiate or stimulate other material. Or would it require an additional >> tigger… I'm wondering why the laser or fluorescent lamps would be >> sufficient to trigger Meson production tom an SPP but the SPP does not >> generate them continuously before the stimulus is applied in these cases. >> (I appreciate it may randomly trigger later with out stimulation). >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:01:14 -0400 >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Would Rydberg Matter in Cosmic Radiation. >> From: janap...@gmail.com >> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >> >> A lot of energy is required to setup the condensate of SPPs, but once the >> SPP condensate is in place, it is highly efficient because it recycles >> energy produced by the meson decay chain back into the SPP condensate. The >> energy loss comes from EMF production and the generation of electrons. Any >> energy from muon catalyzed fusion or pion or magnetic based nuclear >> disruption would find it way into the condensate. >> >> Inputs >> >> The SPP provides three mechanisms that produce energy: entanglement, >> particle production and magnetism. >> >> outputs >> >> The SPP produces heat, XUV and X-ray radiation, magnetism, and electrons >> as output. >> >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Stephen Cooke < >> stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> 1 GeV could be enough to generate Phi Mesons and Kaons through nucleon >> resonance, although I suppose other factors such as resonance Windows and >> conservation of states would need to be taken into account. I wonder if >> they can provide an initial trigger to initiate LENR in the correctly >> resonating medium. If nucleon disintegration is triggered perhaps enough >> energy is generated and particles to sustain the process. >> >> I suppose I cosmic radiation is a trigger the South Atlantic Anomally >> will suddenly become prime real estate! [image: Winking face] >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 29 Oct 2015, at 13:55, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> Interesting conjecture and it shouldn’t be too hard to falsify. This >> precise suggestion with Rydberg matter has not come up before AFAIK, but >> going back to the early days of cold fusion, it had been suggested that one >> reason why P&F seemed to have a higher success rate was the elevation of >> Salt Lake City… which permitted a much larger flux of cosmic rays. Muons >> are known to catalyze deuterium fusion, no Rydberg matter required. >> >> >> >> However (and I do not have a citation) this premise was apparently tested >> many years ago, and found not to be accurate. Apparently Pd-D cold fusion >> does not benefit from higher muon flux. That could mean many things – >> including the lack of deuteron fusion as the relevant explanation for >> excess heat. >> >> >> >> *From:* Stephen Cooke >> >> >> >> I meant "encounter a 1 GeV muon" but neutrino encounters (with possibly >> even higher Energy) might also be potentially interesting if they can occur. >> >> >> > Would Rydberg Matter or UDD be more sensitive to muons from cosmic rays >> or may be even neutrinos? Than ordinary matter? >> > >> > Cosmic ray muons have can have high energy for example there are 10000 >> 1 GeV muons per sq meter per second. Their interaction with ordinary matter >> is very low. I think this has been discussed before but I wonder if there >> is a higher cross section with Rydberg matter. >> > >> > What is the surface area of the Rydberg matter >> > >> > 10000 per sq m /s is I think about 864 per sq mm per day, which implies >> if that if Rydberg matter or UDD is a few 10s micrometers in size it should >> encounter a neutrino about daily on average. >> > >> > The rest would depend on the probability of an encounter actually >> reacting with the matter,I suppose relativistic effects on the wave >> functions would also be important at these energies. >> > >> > I guess this has come up before so if you have a link let me know. >> >> >> >
