I understood this video much better than your other explanation: "velocity derived Lorentzian properties of dilation and contraction that accumulate so slowly at our near stationary end of the spectrum wrt C while a Lorentzian effect produced by suppression might side step this inefficient Pythagorean relationship entirely – It still has to subtract from the square law/isotropy that dominates gravity in the surrounding macro world but as the geometry gets more and more radical it may trump the isotropy to the point where it becomes negligible and positive/negative vacuum energy segregation varies the relativistic factor":)
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 3:51 AM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tkplPbd2f60 > > > On Saturday, November 21, 2015, Roarty, Francis X < > francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: > >> Axil, welcome to my limb, great company but hope we don’t fall :_) When >> you said [snip] This experiment can provide a time comparison profile of >> how the flow of time is increased by positive vacuum energy as a function >> of distance traveled by the LENR reaction products from the zero point of >> the reaction.[/snip] IMHO your “function” is of Lorentzian type and the >> fabric of space itself becomes transforming medium that changes the >> radiations into a safe thermal energy source [traveling distance we can’t >> see from our perspective and encountering time dilation along the way >> “back” to our inertial frame in the “unsuppressed” macro world. In replying >> to your email I start to wonder if I too am attributing too much to the >> standard velocity derived Lorentzian properties of dilation and contraction >> that accumulate so slowly at our near stationary end of the spectrum wrt C >> while a Lorentzian effect produced by suppression might side step this >> inefficient Pythagorean relationship entirely – It still has to subtract >> from the square law/isotropy that dominates gravity in the surrounding >> macro world but as the geometry gets more and more radical it may trump the >> isotropy to the point where it becomes negligible and positive/negative >> vacuum energy segregation varies the relativistic factor within these >> regions wildly with even the slightest motion of gas atoms in any direction >> wrt surrounding geometry – I have said this before but if these regions are >> really relativistic then the possibility of nested regions becomes possible >> and recent threads on single ions being catalysts could be the things Mills >> spoke of WRT self catalyzing hydrinos. All the pcs fit if Casimir effect >> and catalytic action are interpreted as relativistic artifacts due to >> suppression including patents / claims of anomalous decay rates. >> >> Fran >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Friday, November 20, 2015 2:56 PM >> *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:An experiment by Klimov >> >> >> >> newinflow.ru/pdf/Klimov_Poster.pdf >> >> Regarding: >> >> >> Heterogeneous plasmoid behind PVR nozzle is γ-radioactive. Soft >> X-radiation 100 ÷ 10000 eV from this plasmoid. X-radiation decrement is >> very small (radiation intensity decrease is about 20% at L = 100 cm). >> >> >> >> This experiment shows that the thermalization of gamma radiation from >> nuclear activity from this LENR system is not instantaneous but still very >> fact. >> >> This experiment can provide a time comparison profile of how the flow of >> time is increased by positive vacuum energy as a function of distance >> traveled by the LENR reaction products from the zero point of the reaction. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:16 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> You mention that gamma radiation is thermalized in some common manner. I >> still find it difficult to believe that any high energy gammas are >> generated during these reactions. How would all of these be captured? >> >> >> >> For this reason it seems unlikely that gammas ever form in the first >> place. Instead one might suspect their formation is efficiently >> short-circuited by another, faster channel, that is available only in a >> closed-in environment, in contrast to the open environment of a plasma. My >> own favorite possibility: the energy that would normally be emitted as a >> gamma photon is instead dumped into one or more nearby electrons, which are >> stopped in the material or gas, causing low-energy atomic transitions which >> gradually radiate away the energy imparted by the electrons as they come to >> a stop. >> >> >> >> Eric >> >> >> >> >> >
