In reply to  Eric Walker's message of Sat, 19 Dec 2015 16:36:37 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 4:21 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
>(I hope you can, because I can't ;).
>>
>
>If you were to try to explain the mercury, on the assumption that it is not
>contamination, what would be your guess?
>
>Eric

My guess, and that's really all it is, would be e.g.:-

184W+184W => 206Pb + 162Dy + 0.558 MeV
184W+184W => 208Pb + 160Dy + 0.011 MeV
184W+184W => 200Hg + 168Er + 1.086 MeV
184W+184W => 202Hg + 166Er + 0.863 MeV
184W+184W => 194Pt + 174Yb + 0.298 MeV
184W+184W => 196Pt + 172Yb + 0.494 MeV

Actually any combination of the stable isotopes, with the exception of
182W+182W, will produce Hg.

Now, you may ask how on Earth does one get two W atoms to fuse?

Make an ion of one of them and accelerate it under influence of a high voltage
field until it hits another one (for the HV, see my earlier post). This is just
a single exothermic reaction, rather than a chain of reactions.
Ken Shoulder's EV's may also play a role.

As to whether or not this would produce sufficient Hg, I have no idea.
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Reply via email to