Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: But Jed... > > He stated in the patent that the heat source was a catalyst. But catalysts > cannot produce electric power. How can that crazy claim be accepted by the > patent office? >
That is for the patent office examiner to decide. If he or she agrees with you that this claim is crazy, that will be grounds to reject the patent application. This illustrates why it is better to leave out all theoretical claims. If Rossi never says "the heat source is a catalyst" they cannot reject the application on that basis. Since a PHOSITA can replicate without that information (?), there is no benefit to including it. - Jed
