On Feb 2, 2016, at 12:24 PM, Edmund Storms wrote: " I want conventional physics to be used to explain the process UNTIL A POINT IS REACHED WHEN NEW PHYSICS [new particles or new interactions] IS REQUIRED." This point has been reached; we do not know how to explain NAE.
Yesterday I speculated that NAE can be due to a third, totally unknown force, which is neither "short-range-nuclear" nor "long-range-coulomb." The barrier would be lowered if that force, acting on approaching protons, were directed toward the nucleus. Now I am speculating that the needed force is acting on waves (mentioned by Brian J, this morning). What is wrong with the third force speculation? Ludwik Kowalski (see Wikipedia) =================================== > > As you say Peter, "In my opinion, LENR based on metallized hydrogen is a > possible answer to these strange cosmological conundrums.' > > I see we again agree. I made such an observation in my book on page 241. > Perhaps you might like to cite this. > > > Ed Storms > On Feb 2, 2016, at 10:00 AM, Peter Gluck wrote: > >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/02/02-feb-2016-lenr-strange-story-and-info.html >> >> all my best wishes, >> >> peter >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> >> --
