My take on the curves shown after slide 49 is that they were showing evolution of the spectrum. As the machine and Ag vapor gets hotter and hotter, the spectrum will begin to be dominated/overwhelmed by blackbody radiation. What is heated to those temperatures is Ag vapor. I am not sure exactly what you mean by "lasts very long at that temperature" (I presume you mean doesn't melt), but I think the answer is that we are talking about a vapor (gas) of Ag. Plasmas are commonly at that temperature.
I said that the 10V source has a capability of generating up to 10eV effects which correspond to 124nm minimum wavelength photons. In the chart 49 you can see the spectrum from the photons cut-off before reaching down to 124nm. This spectrum is from the emissions of the silver+H2O in the arc before being overwhelmed by the vapor around it that is very hot. A 10eV electron or a 124nm photon is not enough to ionize the inner shells of Ag, even if it is a vapor. Another thing to consider is drawing a Stephan-Boltzmann curve over the UV portion of the radiation below that cuts off just before reaching down to 124nm. The temperature for such a curve would be about 6000K. Even at 6000K, you don't produce blackbody photons at 124nm. My point here being that the soft x-ray spectra are not explained by the temperature (even of 6000K) or 10eV possible excitations from the 10V. OTOH, Karabut has published papers about the generation of laser-like x-ray photons in systems capable only of lower energy transitions. It could be a hydrino signature, but that was not Karabut's conclusion, nor that of Peter Hagelstein who has a theory for what is happening in Karabut's experiments. On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Bob-- > > Look at slides that follow #49—like about 57 and 60 or so. The first is > a multi-colored spectrum of some different runs I believe in Nano meters up > to about 500. And the second is a calculated spectrum for a black body for > 5000 D Kelvin. Note that the multi-colored graph shows each run of the > colored lines turning into a black body spectrum for about 5000 D K. > > If some material stands 5000 D K for any length of time, I would like to > know what it is. May Iridium oxide or some heavy trans-uranium oxide. I > do not think thoria lasts very long at that temperature? Maybe it is a > metal hydrino compound [image: Smile] > > Bob Cook > > *From:* Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Friday, February 05, 2016 8:03 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:BLP demo video > > Thank you, Axil, for this link. It is slide 49, in particular to which I > am making reference. In this slide you can see the soft x-ray set of lines > around 20-60nm, and another set of deep UV lines from 120-300nm. What I > was saying is that the band from 120-300nm is explain-able from the 10V > source, capable of providing 10eV direct excitation, while the lines from > 20-60nm are harder to explain. In fact, it is hard to measure this > spectrum ... I wonder what he used to measure it. > > [image: Inline image 1] > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear Dave, >> >> This may help >> >> >> http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/TechnicalPresentation1.8.16.pdf >> >> These are the slides used in the demo >> >> Slide 53 and/or 57 are what you might need to see what you want. >> >
