I see that he clarified his original statement somewhat. His original post was quite misleading.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, Mar 1, 2016 5:00 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi's tiny 100W quarks Lars March 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM Is your goal with E-Cat X to only produce electricity and with that being able to produce heat and light? Andrea Rossi March 1, 2016 at 2:40 PM Lars: No, she makes the three. Warm Regards, A.R. On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:18 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: I just read Rossi's answer to a question where he is asked if a quark can be built that only puts out electricity with no heat. Frank Acland asked the question and Rossi responded yes with his f9 key active. The answer was fairly clear to me and extremely difficult to believe! I hope his response was due to a missunderstanding of what was asked. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, Mar 1, 2016 1:35 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi's tiny 100W quarks What Rossi wants to do is produce the most basic LENR module that is possible and do it as efficiently as possible using economies of scale. It will be up to the systems integrator to design the backplane and heat transfer system to meet the spec that is required. A factory steam boiler, a railroad locomotive, a ship engine, a steel blast furnace, a cement plant, or a jet engine will all use the Quark as the basic module. How the Quark is put together it its thousands will be the responsibility of the systems developer. The Quark will be the lowest common denominator of all LENR based systems. How it is configured to produce heat and/or light, and/or electricity are defined by how it is configured. For example, an existing 200 megawatt pebble bed reactor might be configured by encasing a single Quark inside a carbon ball and placing that ball inside an existing pebble bed reactor. It is up to the Chinese reactor designer to test each ball for status and replace it when its operational life is over as it goes through its daily inspection cycle. On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:20 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: That is what I recall. Perhaps it is time to recheck this fact within his blog. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, Mar 1, 2016 12:50 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi's tiny 100W quarks Was it stated somewhere that the quark produces little or no heat? On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 12:34 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: I read his postings and remain quite skeptical. I especially find it difficult to believe that the output of one of these devices can be entirely electrical with no residual heat. Dave -----Original Message----- From: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, Mar 1, 2016 11:19 am Subject: [Vo]:Rossi's tiny 100W quarks Rossi has made several comments about a tiny version of the E-Cat X. He says he is thinking of using it as a basic module for larger units. How would he control it? Unless it is much more stable in the smaller size the cost of the control system would be a disadvantage. Interesting that it can be made that small though, There are many portable devices that could be powered by it. See E-CatWorld http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/02/29/rossi-small-e-cat-prototype-units-are-100-w-called-quarks/
