Sometimes we are not able to co-process many contradictory statements. Also the process used in 2016 can be significantly different- for example regarding the radioactive channels open or shot- from what he used in 2011-2. A really complex issue-changing.
Peter On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > do not take this literally >> >> I bet we will have more info tomorrow or even later today >> >> >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-04-2016-number-worth-million-words.html >> > > Quoted from your blog post: > > Andrea Rossi > March 4, 2016 at 10:02 AM > > Gerard McEk: > The radiations have always been measured and no radiation above the > background have ever been measured in 6 years. > The cause of weight, so far, is thought to be caused by tiredness for > excessive physical effort. Obviously my doctors have ordered a complete > list of analysis and scopies. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > > Either my memory is bad, or Rossi's is, because I recall there being lead > shielding at one point whose purpose was explained to be to thermalize > "gammas". > > Eric > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com