[I sent this at 1:18 PM EST and never saw it come back from Vortex, so I'm resending it. Apologies if it arrives twice.]

I dug around on Lenr-Canr.org and didn't find what I'm looking for,
which may just mean I didn't dig very well.  If anyone has a link I'd
appreciate it.  Here's a description of the experiment for which I'd
like to find the paper:

*  *  *

I'm looking for a paper which describes the experiment Scott Little was
attempting to duplicate in the fourth and fifth experiments in his third
series of Mizuno replication runs (posted on his website).

This used a tungsten cathode, operating at incandescence, in an open
cell, with cooling curve measured to determine how fast the cell lost
heat during the run, and weight before and after measured to determine
how much heat was lost to evaporation.

According to a data plot from Mizuno's lab which is posted on Scott
Little's website (received by Little in email) the excess-heat signal
during this experiment began _instantly_, with no loading or warm-up period.

Furthermore, the protocol called for the cell to be operated at the
boiling point.  But, the total input power was substantially less than
would be required to bring the cell to a boil or keep it there, unless
there was substantial excess heat generated inside the cell, from the
very beginning of the run.  That seemed strange.

In an earlier thread Mike Carrell pointed out:

Making proper electrical powere measurements on something as noisy as
Mizuno's plasma electrolysis cell is definitely not done by a "few meteres
stuffed in a bag" unless these are very carefully selected widebasnd power
meters made by a few manufacturers in the world.

So, after reading this, I got to wondering, and now I'd like to know how
Mizuno's power measurements were done, and that information would very
likely appear in the paper ... if I could find it.... and I'd also like
to know more about the cell coming to a boil with 25 watts more going
out through the cell walls than coming in as electrical power, and that
info would surely be in the paper, too.


Reply via email to