Regarding: "Temperatures in the cell range from 150°C - 5000°C. (Rossi agrees he said this previously 2/10/2011) This has to be a misunderstanding. Ni melts at 1453°C.
Standard module consumed 500 W control current and produced 4 kW in 2010. (7/14/2010) Over the course of development, 37 devices have “blown up.” (Rossi, 4/23/2011)" Rossi stated this in a patent application. He wanted to cover the condition of reactor meltdown where the reactor went into a vapor stage, The nature of reactor meltdown was not understood at that time so a contradiction was assumed regarding the melting point of nickel. There was no contradiction as it turned out. On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Randy Wuller <rwul...@freeark.com> wrote: > It seems to me there is only one issue which will determine the > significance of this test, was IH controlling it and will they be reporting > the results. If so, all the speculation about Rossi being a fraud is > nonsense and a figment of imagination. > > > > If IH wasn’t’ involved and didn’t control the test and won’t support the > results then the speculation is correct and not nonsense. > > > > The ability to test a device over a year under the circumstances would > have to be child’s play. > > > > So we have to wait to see if IH speaks to the test. > > > > Ransom > > > > *From:* Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:33 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Rossi and IH have received the ERV Report > > > > *From:* Alain Sepeda > > There is no absolute third party as interest and incentive connect…[snip]… The > only conspiracy is a consensus… This is not a conspiracy but a > groupthink, mutual assured delusion as Benabou name it. > > Daniel Rocha wrote: > > Rossi's definition of 3rd party is somewhat exotic. > > Gentlemen, > > I am overjoyed to see that a few others who have studied this ongoing > tragi-comedy are stepping up to the soap-box to label it as a staged > rabble-rousing embarrassment … being closer to entertainment than to > science. > > It is reminiscent of a recreation of “Waiting for Godot” with Rossi’s > hapless fan-club believing that an existential magician will appear to > save the masses from the devil’s excrement -- in the face of doubt from > the dreaded intelligentsia, their so-called patho-skeptics. > > MAD or “mutually assured delusion” is a better descriptor for those who > do not want to break it down into the teachable moment that it will morph > into – a few days after the new wears off the so called “third party report” > - and the stink rises. > > My sincere hope is that there is a grain of truth in the otherwise phony > results, > and that the year-long effort was not a complete work of fiction. > However, that stance is an extreme minority view: that Rossi can be both > con-artist-deluxe and misunderstood genius inventor, at the same time. > > He is a one-of-a-kind, no matter what the bottom line happens to be. Six > years ago, before his almost complete disregard for the truth was exposed, > we labeled Rossi as the “most interesting man in the world” and that > descriptor has a little more mileage on it, but my guess is that the house > of cards is about to implode, and Rossi’s fan-boys will go back to waiting > for Godot. >
