Dear Peter,
Thanks. Yes, you can use it as is.
Jack

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:30 AM Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Jack,
>
> do you allow me to publish this in my blog EGO OUT?
> as it is or add what you wish.
> It well thought and clearly written, why should we limit the readers?
>
> Best,
>
> Peter
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Jack Cole <jcol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What would convince people one way or another about whether the 1 MW
>> plant works?
>>
>> The following is purely speculative, but if true could lead to a full
>> resolution of the mystery of the E-Cat.  Imagine that not long after Rossi
>> changes the charges in the 1MW plant and tells IH that it is back to full
>> efficiency, they say, "Great! Now move along Rossi to do your own
>> research."   ERV comes and picks up his instruments. Rossi leaves. In the
>> meantime, Fulvio and others stay behind (who know how to operate the plant)
>> and other scientists and engineers come in.  At their leisure, and without
>> the presence of Rossi, IH's scientists and engineers conduct their own
>> tests of energy balance.
>>
>> At the end of these tests, they pull the fuel charges, and turn the plant
>> back on.  Without the fuel, their measurements show a COP of approximately
>> 1.  Of course, if they hooked up their instruments and got a COP of 1 with
>> the fuel still installed, then testing ends quickly.  Either they verify
>> the effect or that the test was wrong.  Either way it goes is a victory.
>>
>> If this did not happen, people may claim that Rossi tweaked operating
>> variables until he could fool the instruments.  Or they may claim that the
>> ERV was chosen by Rossi or was unable to perform the test competently.
>>
>> In addition to the above (imagined) scenario, let's imagine one further
>> thing.  As Rossi claimed at the beginning of the relationship between IH
>> and himself, IH is in full possession of the formula for making an E-Cat
>> work.  Their scientists/engineers have also been experimenting and
>> conducting their own completely independent tests.  If that is also true,
>> then we would have even greater evidence that either the E-Cat works or
>> never has.
>>
>> Jack
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Peter Gluck
> Cluj, Romania
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>

Reply via email to