It's possible that IH simply doesn't have the money to pay and they flaked.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Robert Lynn <robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > *De-lurks* > > Ridiculous to assert that IH have not acting in good faith - if the demo > worked they would be the happiest people in the world and would be on track > to make vast amounts of money even if they had to hand over 90million they > would be doing so with a big smile on their face. The very simple truth is > that Rossi has made big claims and has (as usual) failed to deliver. > Almost certainly IH will have their hands tied due to confidentiality > agreements, so will be prevented from revealing in detail just how > bad/unconvincing things are and how ridiculous Rossi's usual dissembling > shenanigans have been. > > Looking back through all his demos he has never done one that has > unequivocally proven that it works - always potential errors greater than > claimed outputs. I note also that attempted replications by those using > high standards of practice like MFMP have not managed to get LENR > unequivocally working - accepting that reality and yet believing that Rossi > has through incredible luck and bad experimental practices succeeded with > different configurations, different temperature regimes and different > ignition methods and approaches with massive power outputs and high COPs > where all others have failed is several bridges too far in the level of > credulity required. I am no longer willing to give Rossi the benefit of > the doubt - he is transparently just playing for time and more money, and > with his track record you would need to be a mug or the king of wishful > thinking to keep believing in him. > > The only vague question left in my mind is whether he truly believes he > has cracked the LENR nut. I could be convinced that he does, and is > fooling himself, but think it most likely he does not given how long his > circus has been going on. > > On 8 April 2016 at 12:10, Frank Znidarsic <fznidar...@aol.com> wrote: > >> It is Rossi that says that the test was OK. According to IH, it was not OK, >> > because IH says three years without success, not merely 1 year. So, the >> > money is still in the escrow. >> >> >> Maybe we should ask Steven Krivit. He seems to have the heads up on a >> lot of this stuff. >> > >
