Hi all In reply to Jones Beene
There is only your imagination here. I deal in facts. Fabio Penon was the primary engineer that IH helped select on which to base their Due Diligence for purchase of the E-Cat license and IP access, they were so happy with his work and that of the team they select and that they agreed for him to run that they spent $10 dollars as a result. There is no wiggle room here Jones Beene the facts are facts. IH could at any time in the past few years have asked for him to be replaced, but the fact remains they did not do so, ipso facto he was IHs choice for the ERV asnd they were fully satisfied with him. Kind Regards walker On 10 April 2016 at 17:09, Ian Walker <walker...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all > > In reply to Jones Beene > > There is only imagination here. I deal in facts. > > Fabio Penon was the primary engineer that IH helped select on which to > base their Due Diligence for purchase of the E-Cat license and IP access, > they were so happy with his work and that of the team they select and that > they agreed for him to run that they spent $10 dollars as a result. > > There is no wiggle room here Jones Beene the facts are facts. > > IH could at any time in the past few years have asked for him to be > replaced, but the fact remains they did not do so, ipso facto he was IHs > choice for the ERV asnd they were fully satisfied with him. > > Kind Regards walker > > On 10 April 2016 at 16:57, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> *From:* Ian Walker >> >> > The key fact remains - Fabio Penon was the primary engineer that IH >> helped select and approve for the E-Cat Test. IH felt so secure in the >> capabilities of the team they selected that agreed with their assessments to >> the tune of $10 million. >> >> >> >> No. That is not a fact. Part of it comes from Rossi’s allegation in the >> complaint and the rest from your imagination >> >> >> >> >> > >