I should have said: And that only as a group and or over time or at a distance does the fields become a smooth inverse square with no irregularities, perturbations or features.
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:56 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe I'm missing something here, but all this strong, weak and 5th force > nonsense... > > Couldn't it simply be that the electric field from a single subatomic > particle isn't a perfect inverse square law field on the micro-scale > especially at a single point in time, but has perturbations. maybe an axis > related to spin. > > And that only as a group and or over time does the field become a smooth > inverse square, indeed perhaps "lines of force" actually exist. > > This up close, packed into a nucleus or another tight cluster (Ken > Shoulder electron charge cluster) the repulsion might be overcome. > > Not another force, just discontinuities in the electric field. > > Otherwise doesn't Ken Shoulders work point to a 6th force? > > John > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Russ, a great find. >> >> A new boson must carry a new force since bosons are force carriers. But I >> wonder if this force could be something that comes out of the dirac >> equations that has not been seen before experimentally, Maybe this new >> particle is carrying the monopole charge? The experimenters should put this >> particle in a magnetic field and see how it bends. >> >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Here’s a lead on one of the great mysteries, just how is an electron >>> coupled to a neutron as clearly neutrons spit out electrons when they >>> decay. >>> http://www.nature.com/news/has-a-hungarian-physics-lab-found-a-fifth-force-of-nature-1.19957 >>> >>> >>> >>> Of course if ordinary neutrons hold on to ordinary electrons, albeit >>> weakly, that could explain more than a few mysteries. >>> >> >> >
