More examples of programmable magnets https://youtu.be/IANBoybVApQ?t=2m14s
Harry On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:46 PM, H Ucar <jjam...@gmail.com> wrote: > This demonstation of 'correlated magnetic phenomenon' is not working > as explained. Obviously if magnets allowed to move freely they arrange > their positions for attraction only and they will stick. Otherwise > they had found a way to circumvent the Earnshaw theorem. > > On 5/28/16, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: H Ucar > > > >> I experimentally show oscillatory magnetic interaction between dipole > >> bodies exhibits strong repulsion at short distance therefore provides > >> eqilibrium for the bound state in presence of attractive magnetic or > >> electric forces... This mechanism could be the origin of weak and strong > >> interactions without requiring new forces or glue particles.... Since > the > >> bound states through magnetic interactions are fully dynamic, it might > be > >> possible to disturb or break it easier than if based on static > forces.... > > > > > > This is insightful - and I agree with the general conclusion despite the > > vast difference in scale, when moving from centimeters to angstroms. The > > same point is also made by the "correlated magnetic" phenomenon, in which > > "repel" and "attract" functions are coded into a single magnet, which > does > > both depending on relative position. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POc32aioLFE > > > > The strong and weak force could be a similar situation - with the > so-called > > 5th force being a relic of one or the other. > > > > > > > > > >
