Or in more direct wording the benefit of the mentioned radiation was a greater than 30 fold reduction in cancer when compared to those people who were not "accidentally' exposed to long term Co60 radiation. Children born to parents exposed to the radiation showed 14 times fewer congenital defects! The list goes on. The whole topic of radiation and humans has been forever the victim of lies by those with economic and political power aspirations, avarice, and arrogance.
-----Original Message----- From: a.ashfield [mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net] Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2016 2:17 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Powerful Shot Against Believers In "No Safe Dose" Of Radiation Not only is there good evidence that the LNT theory is wrong, there is quite a lot of evidence for hormesis. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2477708/ "The observation that the cancer mortality rate of the exposed population is only about 3 percent of the cancer mortality rate of the general public" (!) I know this paper was challenged but it was in general terms, rather like you know AGW is true because the consensus says so. LNT is the safe, conservative theory, but what most people don't realize is just how much money it costs, that is probably unnecessary.
