On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 11:36 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
> Rossi never claimed the customer used all the heat in the process. He > said the balance was vented. > Excuse us? I'm not following all this close enough to understand from this exchange: is this customer location *also* the location of the verification experiment as well..? If so -- how could *any* heat whatsoever just be 'allowed' to vent..??
