An interesting read, but it only goes up to 2009 which is before the
subject gets really interesting if you are interested in CF utility as I
am. The English version is in too good English for it to be a translation!
The mind set was that one had to look for neutrons in the early days
rather than heat and nothing about Ni/H2 show how much Rossi brought to
the party. The following extracts show the academic mind set about that
at the time.
There are a number of experiments that seem to show that it is
possible to have excess heat production in a different experimental
system: nickel and hydrogen rather than palladium and deuterium. In
this case the only reasonable explanation for nuclear fusion reactions
is the fusion of hydrogen with one of the few deuterons that are
always present in hydrogen as impurities.
(page 36)
.We are still far from developing applications. Thus, it was to
be expected that enterprises that were born with the aim of having a
practical fall-out in short time had to give up.
On 8/29/2016 10:20 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
In Italian:
ENEA, /FUSIONE FREDDA Storia Della Ricerca in Italia/. 2009, Rome,
Italy: ENEA.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ENEAfusionefre.pdf
<http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ENEAfusionefre.pdf>
In English:
ENEA, /COLD FUSION The History of Research in Italy./ 2009, Rome,
Italy: ENEA.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ENEAcoldfusion.pdf
<http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ENEAcoldfusion.pdf>
