Why do you say the pressure was higher than 0.0 bar when that is what is
reported?
At 102.8C it would be dry steam.
AA
On 9/2/2016 10:26 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com <mailto:peter.gl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
From the reservoir a pump sends water to the generators where it
is converted in steam and goes to the customer.
Yes, but it is a closed loop. All of the water is condensed and
returned. The reservoir water level does not change much from day to
day, except because of evaporation.
So you can measure the entire flow volume at any point in the loop.
(Actually it is probably not steam. The pressure is higher than 0.0
bar, and it probably liquid water.)
I hve explained you why and how the heat is measured.
If you have explained this, please tell us what instrument Rossi used
to measure the steam quality. A flow meter cannot do this.
Do you cannot understand this?
You have a certainty of that half(?) empty pipe snd you rehect
elementary logic.
Elementary logic says that when you find rust stains halfway up a
pipe, with the top end of the pipe clean, that means the water level
was halfway up the pipe and the pipe was half empty.
You manifest a Teflon brain syndrome in this problem, why should I
continue to discuss with you? Really?
You have never discussed this. You have never given any reason why
there should be rust stains in only half of the pipe and flow meter
orifice. You cannot give any reason for this other than the fact that
it was half empty. You have also refused to tell us why the manual
warns against running the meter with a half-empty pipe if -- as you
claim -- such pipes do not exist. You have evaded discussing this
proof. You have not discussed anything. Plus I am sure you have no
idea whether Rossi checked the steam quality.
- Jed
