Ethan Siegel persevere "Errare Humanum est Perseverare Diabolicum"
http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2016/09/25/comments-of-the-week-128-from-elementary-particle-to-cold-fusion-fraud/ anyway only the one who never sinned can throw the first stone... on point worry me, is the MFMP enthusiastic claims that they have a perfect and definitive demo that could resist not only to skeptics, but also to pigeon chessmasters. Siegel, Pomp&al are happily preparing to bash the community for a "non-delivery-of-promis-as-we-are-used". 2016-09-26 0:00 GMT+02:00 a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>: > Peter, I posted this as a comment on the Forbe's piece. You could also > comment there. > AA > > Ethan Siegel, you are in error in several of your statements and as I > found several years when I contacted you over your quote used in Wikipedia, > you keep your eyes firmly closed and refused to look at evidence that > proves you wrong. Last time I recall you said you were too busy. > . > Bill Katakis answered your answer well and as far as I can see in Forbes > strange comment format you failed to reply to it. You wrote: > "they would have contacted me and offered to show me their research over > the past five years..." What arrogance! Why on earth would they bother? > Do you really consider yourself that important? > > You were wrong about hot fusion being the answer too. With their track > record and ITER costing $25 billion for 8 minutes of operation if it works > in the 2030s and a commercial reactor in the 2050s, it looks like it would > be uneconomic even if it did work. Good lifetime employment for the troops > though. > > You claim "...willing to provide you with a verifiable, working device > that you can investigate independently, nor with an experiment you can > repeat yourself. Any contention to the contrary is philosophically > indefensible." You are wrong again. Apparently you think if you had seen > the Wright Brothers fly.that would not be proof of flight. > The problem with LENR not being more open is that since the bungled > failures of MIT & CalTech to replicate Pons & Fleischmann the US Patent > Offuce has refused to grant patents in the area. As many now know the hot > fusion phyicists failed to load the Palladium with sufficient Deuterium for > the process to start. > > I could add pages of proved experiments to what Katakis wrote but there is > no point when you won't look at it. > > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Vo]:answer to Ethan Siegel, LENR is a scientific Pechvogel > Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 14:34:31 -0400 > From: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > > Peter, > Don't waste your time on Ethan. From a distant email exchange I had with > him about his quotations that were in error, being used in Wikipedia, he is > simply not interested in looking at any evidence contrary to his previously > stated opinion. > AA > > > On 9/25/2016 1:41 PM, Peter Gluck wrote: > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/09/sep-25-2016-dear- > ethan-lenr-is.html > > if somebody knows Ethan can send this to him...thanks > > peter > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > >
