Mills may have designed his device wisely to avoid nuclear fusion, especially, if the fusion reaction produced neutrons and other hazardous penetrating radiation.
Bob Cook From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 6:58 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:A "eutectic mist" for maximum catalytic surface area From: Axil > A cavitation based bubble compression process using a mix of Lithium 7 > fluoride and lithium 7 hydride salt using ultrasound might also work. Too bad the Flynn device was not reduced to practice circa 1982. The patent is older than cold fusion. Cavitation, in this case, would imply a gain from hot fusion dynamics (Lawson criteria) -- but without the benefit of the Mills effect. In retrospect, it would appear to be more expedient (and avoid the use of a pure isotope) to employ the Mills effect first, and then use that strong gain from EUV emission to implement fusion as a secondary effect of hydrogen redundant ground states. If Mills is correct, one could imagine a combination of the two where there is net gain without fusion, but a larger gain (“yuge”) with both in a bootstrapping arrangement. The Flynn reactor with lithium-silver eutectic would feed an adjoining upper chamber with the eutectic mist of catalyst. Of course, Mills would avoid nuclear fusion at all costs… even to his own detriment. ---------------------------------------------- Method of generating energy by acoustically induced cavitation fusion and reactor therefor US 4333796 A (aka “Flynn”) ABSTRACT Two different cavitation fusion reactors (CFR's) are disclosed. Each comprises a chamber containing a liquid (host) metal such as lithium or an alloy thereof. Acoustical horns in the chamber walls operate to vary the ambient pressure in the liquid metal, creating therein small bubbles which are caused to grow to maximum sizes and then collapse violently in two steps. In the first stage the bubble contents remain at the temperature of the host liquid, but in the second stage the increasing speed of collapse causes an adiabatic compression of the bubble contents, and of the thin shell of liquid surrounding the bubble. Application of a positive pressure on the bubble accelerates this adiabatic stage, and causes the bubble to contract to smaller radius, thus increasing maximum temperatures and pressures reached within the bubble. At or near its minimum radius the bubble generates a very intense shock wave, creating high pressures and temperatures in the host liquid. These extremely high pressures and temperatures occur both within the bubbles and in the host liquid, and cause hydrogen isotopes in the bubbles and liquid to undergo thermonuclear reactions. In one type of CFR the thermonuclear reaction is generated by cavitation within the liquid metal itself, and in the other type the reaction takes place primarily within the bubbles. The fusion reactions generate energy that is absorbed as heat by the liquid metal, and this heat is removed from the liquid by conduction through the acoustical horns to an external heat exchanger, without any pumping of the liquid metal https://www.google.com/patents/US4333796 [https://www.google.com/patents?id=&printsec=frontcover&img=1&zoom=1]<https://www.google.com/patents/US4333796> Patent US4333796 - Method of generating energy by acoustically induced cavitation fusion and reactor therefor<https://www.google.com/patents/US4333796> www.google.com , and of the thin shell of liquid surrounding the bubble. Application of a positive pressure on the bubble accelerates this adiabatic stage, and causes the bubble to contract to smaller radius, thus increasing maximum temperatures and pressures reached within the bubble. At or near its minimum radius the bubble generates a very intense shock wave, creating high pressures and temperatures in the host liquid. These extremely high pressures and temperatures occur both within the bubbles and in the host liquid, and cause hydrogen isotopes in the bubbles and liquid to undergo thermonuclear reactions. In one type of CFR the thermonuclear reaction is generated by cavitation within the liquid metal itself, and in the other type the reaction takes place primarily within the bubbles. The fusion reactions generate energy that is absorbed as heat by the liquid metal, and this heat is removed from the liquid by conduction through the acoustical horns to an external heat exchanger, without any pumping of the liquid metal. Jones Beene wrote: The recent revelation from Mills/ BrLP … that after 25 years and $100 million spent, the most effective catalyst found thus far is silver… and he uses it in the form of vapor by passing an electric arc… this scenario raises the question of an alternative method which could be implemented at lower operating parameters. The boiling point of silver is almost 4000F (2190 C) which is out of the question for most experimenters. An alternative to thermal vaporization would be a mist or fog – possibly created from the liquid state by ultrasonics – similar to the foggers are used with water. In the case of silver, the melting point is high as a pure metal; however, silver is notorious for forming eutectics with markedly lower m.p. The most interesting eutectic found so far for LENR would be lithium-silver; since lithium may catalytic in a different way as well as active for a fusion reaction. Thus a lithium-silver eutectic which melts at less than 300 C could be irradiated with ultrasound to produce a catalytic fog or mist in a near vacuum chamber which is much easier to pull off on a small scale than the massive arc required to vaporize silver. Ionization would be initiated using a radioactive isotope and become self-sustained at a higher level by EUV emission.
