Brian— With all due respect, there IS Rossi IP. It was identified in the Rossi/IH contract in an Appendix—very specific. I read it all. It was generally referred to as E-Cat IP and specified in several different documents, including the E-Cat US patent as I recall.
It did not include much technical information about Pd and D reactions and reactors, which may cause it to be worthless SOUR GRAPES in some people’s estimation. If it were worthless as you indicate, it certainly has spurred a lot of Ni-H LENR technology and LENR+ development (as Peter Gluck so consistently identifies) to produce investment in R&D around the World. I admit that I am frequently confused, but not about Rossi’s alleged fraudulent life. My main confusion is trying to understand the motives of people who attempt to discredit Rossi’s work. I am concluding after following the treatment of P&F in 1989 and thereafter that some of the same motives that drove the discrediting of P&F are pertinent to deciding how Rossi should be handled. In a political realm I consider such motives would be labeled conservative and in opposition to progressive peoples’ motives. Bob Cook From: Brian Ahern Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 4:25 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bill Gates connection to LENR? There is no IP!!! Every time you forget or deny Rossi's fraudulent life, you get confused. Rossi has absolutely nothing. I suspect that a settlement of the Federal Case in Florida will happen about February 2017 with Rossi maintaining control of the IP and much money changing hands. There is potential for a huge fish fry, however. Bob Cook
