Found this in mail during search and worthy of mention as a first case model
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
On Sunday, June 14, 2015 4:08 AM, Harvey Norris <[email protected]> wrote:
From my understanding, there are situations where the amount of energy in
oscillation between L and C in series resonance can exceed the amount of real
energy manifested as I squared R heating losses. Many years ago I got the idea
that that if you sandwiched three phases of 120 degree time separated magnetic
fields together from spiral made inductors of maximum mutual inductance; you
could reverse the polarity of the middle segment making it only 1/6 th out of
phase with its top and bottom segments and thus acting like a magnetic triode,
the middle element would cause the magnetic fields from the exterior elements
to be expanded in the opposite direction of the interior magnetic compression
being made for 5/6ths of the cycle reaction time. The problem with this idea is
that time is directional and because of phase rotation depending on the way the
stacks are arranged in order, one phase will always be inducing current on the
next one in the phase rotation, and the currents in the stack cannot be
balanced. Just like in mathematics it takes nine consecutive numbers for a
number array to be both horizontally, vertically and diagonally balanced as a
magic square, the three phase reactive currents require nine elements to form a
balanced mutual induction between phasings on a lateral placement scheme such
as this. The following demonstration made four years ago from what I called a
266 machine offers an initial confirmation of the working principle involved
with using magnetic compression to affect another magnetic expansion, and then
to collect that energy via means of resonant secondary inductors. An initial
quandary is made when we measure the wrong things and assume over-unity. Here
in this video 11 times the amount of energy going in the top primary is taken
out of its secondary, and on the other side of the stack 7 times this amount
occurs. But we are not counting what the middle segment as the magnetic
propelling agent consumes, but even then the energy coming out of the combined
secondaries is clearly greater then what is apparently being inputed to the
primaries.Acting Q's of 10 found on Secondary Reactive/Resonant tests.
https://youtu.be/32KwpmBcXZcSo what gives here and why is this not
"over-unity"? The saving grace made in this demonstration is that the input is
made without a field of the 3 phase alternator and we know that it is near a 1
volt level. The fiasco that creeps in here is that we are very accustomed to
concluding that the I^2R losses represent the true power input, which is always
less then the "apparent V times I " power input. However in an ideal series
resonance which never seems to be possible VI=I^2R. And here in this instance
the top .5 ohm primary layer consumes .18 A @ 1 volt, or simply .18 VAR, volts
ampere reactive. The right side of the equation shows slightly in excess to
this at .01 watt primary + .18 watts secondary = .19 watts real heat energy as
I^2R expenditures. Thus a slightly higher top output is made by virtue of the
middle element compression. But the issue here is that contrary to most
observations here in this special circumstance, the apparent power input must
be considered as the true power input, and not vice versa, or otherwise the
situation appears as over unity.Sincerely HDN
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
On Saturday, June 13, 2015 1:51 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]>
wrote:
The good, the bad and the uglyAs Peter laments, there are two extremes in the
recent LENR news.Thomas Clark’s report lucidly states exactly what many of us
having been saying for months about the flawed Lugano report.The good news in
the provocative site:http://tet.in.ua/index.php/en/Which is the Laboratory of
Experimental Physics — also known as “TET” — in Ukraine and also in Moscow.
Curiously, it combines Russian and Ukrainian efforts towards alternative
energy.The curious part of this partnership goes all the way back to Chernobyl
– another joint effort that resulted in catastrophe, but which result could be
rectified to a large extent if this new effort is successful.The induction coil
seems to offer the most promise to me – especially when the copper coil can
double as the calorimeter - in the way Jack Cole has proposed. The Ukrainians
seem to be doing exactly the same thing with the pictured coil which is covered
in furnace cement. The problem with this approach, as Jack has documented on
his blog, is capturing a larger proportion of the input energy than is normally
possible with an induction setup.I believe this can be done. I have recently
seen a report showing that induction cooktops, when properly designed at the
best resonance level can actually apply more net energy from the grid to a
cooking utensil than direct contact with the traditional resistive heating
element – which is a surprise since we assume the latter is nearly 100% (it
isn’t).Jones
