Here is a reflection on the history of the Manelas device.

The following link is my source:

http://atlantisrisingmagazine.com/article/tiny-tornadoes-of-magnetism-keys-to-free-energy/


This history smacks of a dark (classified) program established in the 60’s  
regarding the strontium ferrite technology.  The are some 5400 dark programs 
active today in this country alone with only a hand full that have been allowed 
to see the light as time goes by.

A patent may have been issued to Sweet and GE and it was classified.  The 
patent ran out and nobody did any further work on the technology, except Sweet  
and Manelas.  The Sweet helper in the West after Sweet’s retirement may have 
had other motives other than helping Sweet.  The above historical item makes 
that point.  

Then another “helper” from back east arrived at Sweet’s place and Sweet was 
more accepting, if not scared as well.

It seems that Sweet and Manelas were close technically with some common 
experiences.  Sweet was threatened but Manelas was over looked, probably 
because he was reasonably discrete about what he was doing and may not have 
been covered by the dark program order.  

I have had first hand experience with people that have been threatened 
regarding technical issues.  Fear is a powerful motivator to both action and 
inaction.  The Sweet and Manelas reactions are common.

GE had no incentive to make good on the old technology, since it threatened 
more competition and loss of a lucrative product—wind turbans and other power 
production lines.  (This is similar to the fate of LENR over the last 27 years.)

Bob cook











From: Chris Zell
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 9:12 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE

The description of the Manelas device is extremely similar to the Sweet device. 
  And like that device, there seems to be a mystery about how an oddly 
magnetized slab worked – or how it was created. In Sweet’s case, it was barium 
ferrite, I recall.

From: bobcook39...@gmail.com [mailto:bobcook39...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 12:07 PM
To: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>; vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE

Brian—

The cooling effect is unexpected.  It seems that it may be a reversal of the 
2nd Law of T/D—a decrease in entropy instead of an increase.  

Do you know what the thermal conductivity is?  I would guess it may be very 
low, similar to the electrical conductivity.  

Also is there an open circuit voltage produced?  I so where are the  electrodes 
attached—positive and negative?  

It may be that the differential magnetic field inside to the outside acts to 
change the ordering and the entropy accordingly—inside to the surface.  The 
magnetic field may cause in effect a phase change—a change to more order.  It 
may happen only at a certain magnetic strength—B field that is.  And there may 
be a coupling to the Earth’s magnetic field for extraction of energy,  
consistent with energy conservation.

The differential temperature—inside to outside at the surface---maybe a thermal 
magnetic voltage source analogous to the well known thermal electric effect.  

Bob Cook

From: Axil Axil
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 5:20 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE

More...

The Mandela bullot is flat and square with a large surface area. This flat 
topology with a large surface area might permit a maximum of magnetic dipoles 
to form on the surface of the Mandela bullot. I would like to know what type of 
gas filled the black box...is it protium or deuterium or air?

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:

The Manelas Device functional diagram



On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
It might be that the pulsed current of the 137 kilohertz square wave input 
current produces a magnetic dipole with a large instantaneous power factor 
because the current is produced by a square wave like the Brillouin method. The 
24 volt constant current also produces heat and the strontium ferrite magnet is 
heat resistant. The maximum operating temperature of the magnet is 250C and the 
Curie temperature is 450C, With that high temperature operating capacity, 
coherent magnetically based Surface plasmon polaritons may form under the 
influence of the magnetic dipole motion that localize around the magnetic field 
lines as heat photons become entangled with electrons dipoles.

If these magnetic polaritons become coherent, these polaritons may produce 
enough magnetic power to destabilize the nuclei of the gas above the surface of 
the magnet inside the Mandela's Device black box.   

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote:
The Manelas billet is strontium ferrite and is very high electrical 
resistivity. This eliminates eddy currents as a loss mechanism


From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 6:18 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE 
 
Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE


"Note my recent comment regarding the Manelas Device reflecting your notice 
about the discovery of time crystals. There may be a connection with the 
magnetic materials used in the device.

Separately, I would note that the design of NAE’s may require a structure which 
allows high magnetic fields (10^12 –10^16 Tesla.) Structures that are 1 or 2 
dimensional may be the key, with the 1-D NAE supporting LENR+, because it 
causes the reaction in a confined space and maintains the 1-D characteristic 
for repeated reactions upon arrival of reactants—H or D or Li or whatever."

There is a branch of physics called "QCD in strong magnetic fields" that has 
conducted workshops on what a strong magnetic fields can do to a nucleus.

http://homepages.uni-regensburg.de/~eng14891/qcdB_workshop/program.shtml 
QCD in strong magnetic fields - uni-regensburg.de
homepages.uni-regensburg.de
Monday 12 November; 09:00 - 09:40: Berndt Müller: When QCD meets QED: 09:40 - 
10:20: Vladimir Skokov: Magnetic field in HIC and anisotropy of photon 
production


and also by another name "Workshop on Magnetic Fields in Hadron Physics" 

http://www.ictp-saifr.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/all-abstracts_logo.pdf 
Workshop on Magnetic Fields in Hadron Physics ICTP/SAIFR ...
www.ictp-saifr.org
Workshop on Magnetic Fields in Hadron Physics . ICTP/SAIFR - São Paulo, BR . 
May 9 - 13, 2016 . List of Abstracts . MONDAY – May 9 . Uses and misuses of the 
NJL ...


One posit of this field is that in a magnetic field of (10^12 –10^16 Tesla.), 
Localization of (anti-)quark orbits by magnetic field enhances chiral symmetry 
breaking effect of attractive interactions.

See

http://homepages.uni-regensburg.de/~eng14891/qcdB_workshop/pdf/QCDB_Mueller.pdf

QCD in strong magnetic fields 

Charged vector mesons can condense in a superstrong magnetic field. This 
superstrong magnetic field can be considered a magnetic catalyst that produces 
charge parity violation thereby producing strange quarks and their mesons.

The question then becomes, can Surface plasmon polaritons(SPP) amplify 
light/electron entanglement to the point where magnetism reaches very high 
strength, enough to produce a magnetic catalyst of mesons. 

When it comes to bose condinsation through ultra dense hydrogen as a way to 
amplify SPPs through superradiance, what matters is the number of SPPs that 
aggregate in that condinsate. 

An analogy of the additive aggregation principle is how 8,000 AA lithium 
batteries can produce enough power to propel a Tesla for over 200 miles. 

Quantum mechanics can do unexpected things.

When protons and neutrons fall apart into mesons, the final result is a 
boatload of electrons that are fabricated from decaying nuclear matter. This is 
where the current observed in the Manelas Device might come from. A large 
anisotropic magnet might be strong enough to produce electrical power strong 
enough and properly focused to tear apart nuclear matter.





Reply via email to