This has been done. I.H. spent large sums of money and worked with experts. They determined that the patent is not valid.
IH should make everything that supports this statement public so that it can be verified by others in a public venue. IH has nothing to lose by supporting their claims by public revelations. On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > Rossi's IP is protected by a patent so he is covered. >> > > A patent that does not work and cannot be replicated is not valid. It is > worthless. He is not protected against anything. In the highly unlikely > scenario that he actually has a positive result, he will lose all IP rights > to it because he did not describe it in the patent well enough for a > PHOSITA to replicate. > > > >> It is worthwhile to verify that that patent is valid. >> > > This has been done. I.H. spent large sums of money and worked with > experts. They determined that the patent is not valid. No one else has been > able to replicate. There is not a single valid example of excess heat from > this experiment. All of the results reported so far, by Parkhomov and > others, have been mistakes. So, as far as anyone can tell, it does not > work. That is regrettable but that's reality. > > - Jed > >
