<bobcook39...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I do not consider that the contractual sale of IP by Rossi included
> training IH in his POHOSITA to obtain long term performance of the E-Cat
> above a COP of 4.
>

I do not recall the details of the contract, but it covered all IP, at any
COP. It covered everything, patented or not. There was no restriction
saying it was only up to a COP of 4. More to the point, Rossi was unable to
produce any excess heat, at any measurable COP. Not 4, not 2, not 1.01. He
tried for a year or more and got nothing.

So, what you say does not apply to this situation. Rossi had a contractual
obligation to provide all IP, without exception.

If he had shown them how to produce any measurable COP, even 1.1, they
would have paid him $89 million.

- Jed

Reply via email to