I'm confused. The third paragraph on page 2 says the cell is intended to operate with constant input power. Wouldn't that tend prevent the temperature from spontaneously falling (due to energy storage) and only permit a spontaneous rise in temperature?
Harry On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:23 PM, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, the numbers in this paper rule out the possibility of energy storage > during the experiment. > . > However, as I recall there is a story floating around that a certain batch > of Pd from the supplier seemed to work best. > If that is true then the energy storage might have happened prior to the > experiment when the Pd was processed > by the supplier. > > > Harry > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Please review the numbers in the paper, which is here: >> >> http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RouletteTresultsofi.pdf >> >> For experiment 4, the excess heat lasted 70 days. The total experiment >> duration was 123 days. If there was a storage phase, it lasted 53 days. >> This would show up as an endothermic reaction, which would reduce power >> output by much more than the exothermic reaction that followed, because it >> would be shorter. Any calorimeter that can measure a positive exothermic >> reaction of X watts can measure an endothermic reaction of -X watts equally >> well. >> >> Energy storage is ruled out. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
