In case youse hadn't noticed -- this ENTIRE saga has moved FAR, far beyond
mere scientific research (no surprise, there). This little drama involves,
politics. It involves 'The Law'. It involves public relations, popular
Science, and not a few other contexts.

So it does NOT make some people here look as good as they think they do, to
be carefully cherry-picking how they want to spin these events in their own
narrow interests.




On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Frank Znidarsic <fznidar...@aol.com> wrote:

> i agree with Jed.
>
> I myself played a leading role in attacking Rossi at LENR Forum. If you
> accuse me of being opposed to cold fusion or being duped somehow to think
> there is problem with Rossi where no such problem exists, I say you are
> contemptible, you know nothing about me, and you have not contributed
> anything to this field compared to me.
>
> - Jed
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
> To: Vortex <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Fri, Jul 7, 2017 5:20 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled
>
> Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> As produced by IH, the spin, astroturfing and propaganda that LENR has
> seen is just a foretaste of the effort that will be put forward by the
> oil/gas/coal/wind/solar industries when LENR goes public.
>
>
> Axil: You said that he has not read the Penon report. So you know nothing
> about Rossi's claims and you have no business discussing them or
> criticizing what I and others say. We know what Rossi claims, and you
> don't, so shut up.
>
> I expect opposition if cold fusion goes public, but there has been NO
> spin, astroturfing and propaganda from I.H. They had no need for that. They
> were not happy with what there was.
>
> I myself played a leading role in attacking Rossi at LENR Forum. If you
> accuse me of being opposed to cold fusion or being duped somehow to think
> there is problem with Rossi where no such problem exists, I say you are
> contemptible, you know nothing about me, and you have not contributed
> anything to this field compared to me.
>
> - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to