Nigel and Jones— IMHO Hatt’s theory of the nature of particles with mass and electrical/magnetic properties is correct. His predictions are consistent with existing experimental evidence and go way beyond the accuracy of existing measurement technology to be confirmed as this technology improves.
The theory of A.C. Jessup is quite close to Hatt’s massification model . These two free thinkers may be considered by the Nobel folks henceforth as Jones suggests. Bob Cook From: JonesBeene<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net> Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2017 7:37 AM To: Vortex List<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: [Vo]:Grand theory of Philippe Hatt This theory will not appeal to everyone but it has attractive features which “tend to grow on you”. Thumbs up from me. http://philippehatt.com/ http://philippehatt.com/document1.pdf The author (like Peter Gluck and Cervantes) is quite fond of, and skilled at neology – making-up new English words – which some find annoying. The author (like Einstein) finds that the precision and simplicity of the basic Universal dynamic (massification/demassification) points to a kind of superior intelligence – which some find annoying Not me, in fact with a little editing this could be made into grand literature - of some arcane but enjoyable genre… “beyond hard sci-fi” or… it could win the Nobel if correct. Take your pick. Apparently this thinking is not new, and others have already borrowed heavily from it. It was presented at Sochi recently, mainly for Russians, but the author’s name was misspelled. Not that anyone noticed…
