My previous comment was not complete. It should be: The General Fusion has many more problems with it INHO than the Unified Gravity device appears to present.
No gammas and only charged particles is the big difference that favors Unified Gravity. Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 ________________________________ From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com <bobcook39...@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 9:39:32 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kinetic energy for H ion The General Fusion has many more problems with it INHO than the Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 ________________________________ From: Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 8:37:59 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Gravity helps overcome Coulomb barrier with 223 ev kinetic energy for H ion And here: https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg105019.html On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com<mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 1:50 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> <bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>> wrote: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2016/0118144.html The following is taken from the link noted above: Hey, Jones, we've been here before: https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg102870.html
