There are a number of magnetic effects that are active inside protons and neutrons that affect their decay.
https://indico.cern.ch/event/277650/contributions/629993/attachments/505990/698572/chernodub.pdf Axial magnetic effect in QCD also see for better info http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf QCD in strong magnetic field A anisotropic magnetic field will generate instantons that destabilize protons and neutrons. Even a weak magnetic field produced by a SmCo7 magnet will generated a small nucleon decay response inside the nucleons due to quark deconfinement. The production of monopole magnetism via spin polarization is the key factor in both LENR and Mills. On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote: > What is the role of magnetism in: > > > LENR > > MILLS > > MANELAS > > > Are they connected? > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Arnaud Kodeck <arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be> > *Sent:* Friday, January 12, 2018 1:41 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly > overlooked in LENR > > > Like Mizuno but Mu metal instead of Ni. > > > > *From:* JonesBeene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] > *Sent:* Friday, 12 January 2018 19:35 > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly > overlooked in LENR > > > > To clarify: > > > > Variance of good catalysts from the ideal 2Ry = 27.2 eV in ionization > potential (the catalytic “hole”) > > > > 1) Molybdenum .07 > > 2) Potassium .09 > > 3) Rubidium .09 > > > > BTW - palladium has a fit at 27.77 eV (.57 variance) which is much further > from an ideal catalytic value than moly. But moly is a poor proton conductor. > > > > This may indicate that hydrogen absorption is more important than catalytic > fit. > > > > AFAIK – no one has ever tried the tactic of alloying or electroplating Pd > onto Mu metal to optimize both goals. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > --------------------------- > > > > … which brings to mind Claytor’s statement that the best alloy he has > found for LENR was a Mu metal alloy. > > > > The use of Mu Metal as the active matrix for LENR could turn out to be the > most valuable detail relative to spin and LENR if Claytor is correct … > using “ Co-Netic” as the matrix alloy. Mu-metal is a nickel-iron alloy, and > the proprietary alloy in question, Co-Netic - has high added molybdenum. > > > > http://custommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com/category/ > co-netic-sheet-and-foil > <https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcustommagneticshielding.magneticshield.com%2Fcategory%2Fco-netic-sheet-and-foil&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf7d515364ac8461fca8b08d559f18632%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636513816222874554&sdata=CHoxI7cS%2FGY0UNTkohjm5q7d4oMBEXM162zqHW1X%2BMQ%3D&reserved=0> > > > > The high permeability makes mu-metal useful not only for shielding against > static and low-frequency magnetic fields but also in converting most of the > energy of an anomalous self-generated field into heat. This is a "soft" > magnetic material that saturates at low magnetic fields and that is the key > to the coupling magnons into heat. The high number of inherent Rydberg > levels in the ionization potential of this alloy could be the key. BTW – it > should be noted that Molybdenum is the closest Rydberg ionization fit to > Mills theory of all metals. That could be another key to understanding. No > other metal is as close to the precise value. > > >
