NASA has funded antigravity resarch, but what is missing is any announcement of
big success.
Anyway, unified field theory research gets mostly ignored; started with
Boscovich (1758), how gravity is a residual of electricity from Boscovich
theory explained at:
Theoretical confirmation of the gravitation new origin having a special
electrical nature - Ioan Has
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Theoretical confirmation of the gravitation new origin having a special ele...
Theoretical confirmation of the gravitation new origin having a special
electrical nature with Coulomb law corre... | |
|
|
On Monday, 29 January 2018, 14:53, JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
#yiv7766546716 #yiv7766546716 -- _filtered #yiv7766546716
{font-family:Helvetica;panose-1:2 11 5 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;} _filtered #yiv7766546716
{panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv7766546716
{font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}#yiv7766546716
#yiv7766546716 p.yiv7766546716MsoNormal, #yiv7766546716
li.yiv7766546716MsoNormal, #yiv7766546716 div.yiv7766546716MsoNormal
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;}#yiv7766546716 a:link,
#yiv7766546716 span.yiv7766546716MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv7766546716 a:visited, #yiv7766546716
span.yiv7766546716MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:#954F72;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv7766546716
.yiv7766546716MsoChpDefault {} _filtered #yiv7766546716 {margin:1.0in 1.0in
1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv7766546716 div.yiv7766546716WordSection1 {}#yiv7766546716 Bob,
There is a fair amount of both brilliance (cough, cough) and silliness in
Mills hand-waving. His misidentification of the Higgs boson is in the later
category. As for the “antigravity electron” see his patent app (thanks to the
spice man for this) Patent WO1995032021A1 - Apparatus and method for providing
an antigravitational force The bigger question is: if this antigravity claim
works why has NASA and the Pentagon ignoredthemt? And while we are at it: Why
did NASA drop the hydrino rocket? BLP did not even get to Phase two on that
one. Where is the CIHT battery? Where is the reverse gyrotron? Plus, in spite
of his own genius - Mills fails to give Dirac and other credit and ignores
emerging findings in physics when he cannot adequately rationalize them into
his so-called classical view..A fair appraisal is that he is a creative genius
on paper, but a lousy inventor. He simply cannot put good ideas into practice,
despite throwing $150 million (or more) at the problem. He is great fund-raiser
but after all these years there is not a satisfactory independent replication,
nor a real sample of hydrinos to test. The sun-cell will most likely be yet
another failure in this long list. If so, he will move on to the next round of
funding without a real explanation of why it failed. Hopefully, in a few years
other will be able to push Holmlid’s similar work into practice. All Mills can
do then is to say “told you so” and claim to have been the first … From:
bobcook39...@hotmail.com
For a nice qualitative summary of Mill’s theory see the following link:
http://www.brettholverstott.com/annoucements/2017/8/5/summary-of-randell-millss-unified-theory
