I expect the work was well done. He measured levels at parts/billion against a background of parts per million.
The diffusion rates of helium into the container was calculated as being negligible even at those very low levels. What about helium dissolved in the D2O electrolyte? Was there any discussion of that issue? ________________________________ From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com <bobcook39...@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 1:10 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter andexplains the EM drive The many-body involvement of LENR makes it likely that energy changes associated with kinetic energy in the form of spin and associated angular momentum happen in comparison to kinetic energy associated with a change of linear momentum and its conservation involving only 2 or 3 particles during a short reaction period. An important requirement is that any reaction involving spin kinetics must happen in integral quanta of the reduced Planck constant and happen very fast in a coherent system—maybe with no time delay (or within a given time quanta.) The coherent system of particles allows the required coordination of spin quanta consistent with the 2nd law of TD requiring an increase of disorder within the coherent system reacting. The phonic (vibrational) kinetic energy (heat energy) is a measure of the disorder. Thus, the change in disorder (entropy) is quantized. IMHO the 2nd Law needs a little modification of make it make its math reflect this discontinuous property. I consider the coupling field involved is the local B magnetic field that occurs within the reacting coherent system, since it determines the allowed nuclear energy states of constituent nucleons. as well as, the allowed energy of the orbital electron spin of the constituent lattice electrons. High energy gammas are out of the picture for all practical purposes, since the conditions they need to be produced (large nucleon energy changes) do not occur. The LENR’s are akin to those that occur within NMR machines without the energetic gammas associated with two or three- body reactions and their significant changes of nuclear potential energy to kinetic energy with instanteous conservation of linear momentum. Resonant orbital spin conditions within a coherent system can be engineered to happen by changing the B magnetic field with external applied varying magnetic H fields. Modifying resonant conditions allows LENR control in practical devices with engineered nano parameters. With this in mind dusty plasmas allow better control of individual coherent systems (nano-- particles) than larger condensed matter crystalline structures. IMHO the heat transfer engineering is possible without destruction of the nano-particles making up the dusty plasma. Lithium and Hydrogen are good convective heat transfer agents as well as well as being in LENR directly as a constituent of a coherent system. Bob Cook frm: Brian Ahern<mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 4:21 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter andexplains the EM drive Mitchell Swartz says the gammas are absent because they are spin forbidden. I do not know the rules and their conditions. From: Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 8:11 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter andexplains the EM drive Pray tell as one of the few real cold fusion experimentalists what associations might have come to your mind connecting nanoparticles lasing and cold fusion. Any ideas on how coherent lasing domains might assist in mediating those pesky gammas? On Feb 6, 2018 12:16 PM, "Brian Ahern" <ahern_br...@msn.com<mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com>> wrote: This nanometric laser was developed in 1996 under an AF SBIR Phase II contract. I was the contract monitor. Prof. Nabil Lawandy developed LASER PAINT. It incorporated nanopowders that scattered light and resulted in stimulated emission It is widely used today. From: Russ <russ.geo...@gmail.com<mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com>> Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 6:05 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter andexplains the EM drive McCulloch’s QI concept readily conforms to observed real cold fusion data and is far superior to the armchair speculations that so commonly eschew the real data. The first miracle of cold fusion is that something gives a ‘fusing nudge’ to the reactants, D+D in their native ecological domain, the highly loaded metallic lattice. At the dimensions well known to be that in which prodigious 4He is produced by DD fusion, mere nanometers, the QI notion fits very well. In that dimensional realm McCulloch’s QI Unrah effects might easily offer the nudge to start the cold fusion cascade. Such cold fusion cascades are clearly evident in the data that shows vast numbers of 4He producing cold fusion events deep inside such nanometric metal domains (not on the surface). Once the QI Unrah environment becomes established it might also provide the means to satisfy the second miracle of cold fusion that being the suppression of energetic emissions, that danged missing gamma. The QI Unrah nanometric environment (horizons) it would seem captures and moderates those pesky gammas leaking them into local materials as phonons thus suppression of the expected gammas. Now the question is whether the QI Unrah environment can also serve to induce nanometric masing of those cold fusion powered phonons. That of course leads to the obvious technological device, the phaser😉 This paper just published 4 Jan 2018 speaks of the use of nanometric mirrors to produce masing effects. Seems to be clearly in McCulloch’s QI dimensions that his maths show are appropriate for said Unrah effects. The atom-ecology that is characteristic of active cold fusion materials easily fits here. Just beam over to the Journal Nature to read more…. https://www.nature.com/articles/nmat5065.epdf?shared_access_token=Clp7obKDCjyTay7_Ubjz-9RgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0PR2ms4N9BdyqGfEocfLrVaFTzgJ5vZ5NbrtbWqBzcVlTXQEagaHDIXskwMPwuHb4O9qcz8k9_B-S9us2vcHllZ3Xt2Lwx-pu0qrjDJ_ycXFQ%3D%3D<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com%2Farticles%2Fnmat5065.epdf%3Fshared_access_token%3DClp7obKDCjyTay7_Ubjz-9RgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0PR2ms4N9BdyqGfEocfLrVaFTzgJ5vZ5NbrtbWqBzcVlTXQEagaHDIXskwMPwuHb4O9qcz8k9_B-S9us2vcHllZ3Xt2Lwx-pu0qrjDJ_ycXFQ%253D%253D&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf19c67444e5149a60c0a08d56d5181d1%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636535119197213620&sdata=J%2FbRC%2FwYbHc16eKADvMFS0iigbz%2BaJsEj9JNH6kGo90%3D&reserved=0> From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> [mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>] Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 10:41 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter andexplains the EM drive Jones— I had the same idea about DH and QI together answering the galactic rotation problem. The Mills spectrum of DH surely warrants a comparative review with the observed spectrum from the Milky Way or other near by galaxies. Maybe Mills has already done this comparison; if not, he should IMHO. Bob Cook From: JonesBeene<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net> Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 10:14 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter andexplains the EM drive There is a new study from NASA on dark matter/ dark energy and the reinterpretation of the Chandra findings WRT the mystery radiation signature at 3.5 keV. https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/news/a-new-twist-in-the-dark-matter-tale.html<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nasa.gov%2Fmission_pages%2Fchandra%2Fnews%2Fa-new-twist-in-the-dark-matter-tale.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf19c67444e5149a60c0a08d56d5181d1%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636535119197213620&sdata=zyUD7vJelMxsb1sVrfGxFGfU473%2F8X%2FfHdU71WWG7g4%3D&reserved=0> CERN has a new report on DM as well. The informed opinion on dark matter swings back and forth but for sure, whatever it is, is no longer dark and this is compatible with a version of quantized inertia. At best, McCulloch’s hypothesis would not eliminate DM entirely but instead reduce the need for it - the percentage of mass in galaxies which needs to be explained by something other than the standard model. Causality can be reconciled so long as we do not insist on extremes. Most importantly, from the perspective of LENR, if there is any connection of UDH (ultra dense hydrogen) to dark matter, then of course it becomes very relevant for understanding the dynamics of dense hydrogen. In short, even if DM is a lower percentage of all mass (lower than ~85%) it can be identified with UDH, and that finding is huge for LENR. In McCulloch’s blog he has a page that covers LENR from the perspective of his discussions with Ed Storms and the application of QI to the deuterium lattice. From there, he goes on to the perspective of using advanced semiconductor techniques to achieve an ideal matrix of cracks and surface cavities. Specifically, McCulloch talks about the geometry of 1 nm as being feasible soon, but this is actually possible now. Yet-- if the Chandra findings hold, especially in the context of Holmlid, then the optimal geometry appears to be smaller – about .35 nm which is the wavelength of photons at 3.5 keV. We appear to be moving from nano to pico rapidly. All of which means that silicon valley could find a new technology focus – a newer “next big thing” based on using “picolithography” for both information and energy. From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> What do you think about Mikes theory of quantized inertia (QI)? And what about his use of QI to explain galactic mechanics without dark matter? Does the emdrive mistake void the concept of QI? (The Ted talk has been deleted from youtube apparently. Bob Cook From: Bob Higgins<mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> I have read McCulloch's book. His proposition fails in causality. Filters do not form with a filled state, they have a finite impulse response that he hadn't addressed when I asked him about it. Russ <russ.geo...@gmail.com<mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com>> wrote: Here’s Mike McCulloch’s TedX talk last Thursday. It is remarkable work. https://youtu.be/ZsGZsgd-944<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be%2FZsGZsgd-944&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cf19c67444e5149a60c0a08d56d5181d1%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636535119197213620&sdata=CrEwcDkIfda7AmZTBxIAULruMxiPt%2Fv2TrjkUcvC%2FiE%3D&reserved=0> Mike is what one might call as ‘armchair physics anti-matter’ as he annihilates the fiction of dark matter with straight forward math and real data, eliminating the dark matter fudge that has made a sticky mess of science for a long time.
