As a produce of radioactive decay. the muon is left handed charal. On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 7:53 PM, JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > > > Dunno. Perhaps there is a cross-section for muon absorption and it has a > resonance – as you say. > > > > Axil posted about chirality change speeding up decay… maybe the 6s > electron flips the chirality of the muon and it decays much faster > thereafter. Thus there is an inverse relationship with the thickness of > what should be a shield. > > > > > > *From: *bobcook39...@hotmail.com > > Jones— > > > > Why do muons react more easily with relativistic electrons in the 6s shell > of Pb than with less energetic ones? Is it because of the greater loss of > energy associated with the lower differential masses, and/or some resonance > in the energy field coupling between a muon and a heavy (relativistic) > electron? Neutral muons should not be affected the same way IMHO. > > > > I wonder what electro chemists have to say about the Swedish/Finish > article? > > > > Are there other elements that conduct electricity well that have heavy > electrons like Pb? Is it only s shell electrons that become/are > sufficiently heavy to cause the higher voltage during an > oxidation/reduction? Thorium comes to mind as likely having heavy s shell > electrons. > > > > Bob Cook > > > > *From: *JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> > > > > Interesting... > > I have reproduced a version of Vysotskii's undamped thermal waves results > which he detects using a peizo-electric detector with a high frequency > range (which I could only get from the states). The results suggest that > whatever is being detected is travelling far faster than the velocity of > sound. The detectors are made of PZT = lead zirconate titanate. Could > this unusual property of lead be a clue to what is going on with the Vysotskii > measurements? > > Nigel, > > Yes that is a distinct possibility. I would imagine that the relativistic > electrons can transfer quanta of spin energy - following which their > velocity is replenished by the zero point field. > > The spin would initially interact with thermal waves in the THZ or IR > range in the process of downshifting. > > > > JonesBeene wrote: > > > > Despite its 150 year-old history, the lead-acid battery is not as > well-understood as one might suspect. On paper it should hardly work at > all. Tin – a similar metal to lead will not work when substituted. > > > > More recently, in experiments in 2011 it was demonstrated that most of the > power of the lead-acid batter: 80%+ – or roughly 10 V out of the 13 V of > the electrical potential- comes from relativistic electron effects (as > opposed to redox chemistry) ! This is due to the unusually fast 6s orbital > of lead and a few other heavy metals. The relativistic electrons (they are > paired) could relate to why lead shielding (or normal radioactivity) could > actually increase the signal from muon interaction, rather than shielding > against it. > > > > https://phys.org/news/2011-01-car-batteries-powered-relativity.html > > > > >
