what is meant by lightspeed constancy by modern physics is vague, and in my 
2018 talk I point out if what is meant is conventionalism then its Boscovich's 
theory (published 1758)

2017 talk on Boscovich: Dragoslav Stoiljkovic and Roger Anderton: "Boscovich's 
comprehensions of relative movement"
points out Boscovich's theory in its considertaions of absolute motion and 
relative motion: allows FTL, acceleration without force etc.
Dragoslav Stoiljkovic and Roger Anderton: "Boscovich's comprehensions of 
relative movement" 2017

  
|  
|   
|   
|   |    |

   |

  |
|  
|    |  
Dragoslav Stoiljkovic and Roger Anderton: "Boscovich's comprehensi...
 Dragoslav Stoiljkovic and Roger Anderton: "Boscovich's comprehensions of 
relative movement" presen...  |   |

  |

  |

 




 

    On Wednesday, 5 September 2018, 20:47, JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> 
wrote:
 

 <!--#yiv7556722630 _filtered #yiv7556722630 {font-family:"Cambria 
Math";panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv7556722630 
{font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}#yiv7556722630 
#yiv7556722630 p.yiv7556722630MsoNormal, #yiv7556722630 
li.yiv7556722630MsoNormal, #yiv7556722630 div.yiv7556722630MsoNormal 
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", 
sans-serif;}#yiv7556722630 a:link, #yiv7556722630 
span.yiv7556722630MsoHyperlink 
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv7556722630 a:visited, #yiv7556722630 
span.yiv7556722630MsoHyperlinkFollowed 
{color:#954F72;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv7556722630 
.yiv7556722630MsoChpDefault {} _filtered #yiv7556722630 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 
1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv7556722630 div.yiv7556722630WordSection1 {}-->Most reports of 
superluminal effects are not hard to debunk. This one is more difficult.  
https://www.space.com/41724-neutron-star-merger-superfast-jet.html  All one can 
say about this reasoning, or lack thereof,  is “lame”… or to be more precise: 
“invented.”  The conclusion of superluminal emission can probably be debunked 
eventually but not by inventing a “cocoon” which had to be travelling even 
faster in order to be in place to distort the measurement…  Maybe it is simply 
poor technical writing.    

   

Reply via email to