Commentary is added to explain the deviance of actions here. It presents a solution to the paradox of what should occur as a reciprocal action; but does not. Comments made here from https://youtu.be/PbUcJTd3nTAI had I had wrote in the commentary that; "In the reverse operation a reciprocal loss in moving the energy from a small capacity to a larger one can be shown. " Examinations of ratios shown by extractions of this video shows that this presupposition is false. A reciprocal ratio is replaced by a time distortion ratio as shown by forward and reverse operations for comparisons of ratios as follows for the first case; fwd operation @ 25 volts https://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/46127172765/in/dateposted-public/ It can be speculated that a 50% time dilation occurs for the resonant transformation case shown here. The amperage meter actually records the rate of coulombs of charge crossing the cross sectional area per TIME PERIOD. which is noted as dq/dt. If dt is compressed to half of its source sending value, dq/dt will be doubled. This is noted as a doubling from the amp value that would be applied if the resistive ratio of 6.8/1 were applied to the reduction. Essentially here we have an increase of the L ratio with a corresponding decrease of the I squared ratio. This decrease however is itself countered by an amperage increase due to the time dilation which can be proved by the opposite analogy of actions that should take place if the process were reversed. Here if the source is noted as clock A and clock B runs 50% slower then A(due to time dilation) ; then B will see the source running at twice it's rate. Conversely if Clock C is running 50% faster then A (due to time elongation); its clock will see a source clock running at a rate 2/3 LESS rate then it's own. If this were to be shown to happen by metering as I have shown here, it definitely leads credence to the theory that a time distortion exists between the resonant transformations. It is also speculated that since a non-symmetrical time distortion between the systems exists, this explains why no expected reciprocal action is recorded that would develope if no time distortion took place between the systems. The elongation of time as the converse proof of the elongation of time with respect to it's source is shown at bkwd operation comment @ 25 volts https://www.flickr.com/photos/harvich/40076241583/in/dateposted-public/Here 14.14 ma goes into a process showing a time "elongation" with respect to it's source. In both cases of time dilation and time elongation cited here, a deviation from the case where no time distortion takes place is shown. This is a deviation from the normal "reciprocal" action evidenced by inversely proportional quantities where this is shown as from the linear relationship shown as the reduction of I being inversely proportional to the increase of R or Z as this example of AC applies. The PROOF of time distortion consists of showing the DEVIATION from what would occur in the normal (lossless) reciprocal relationship for unity power transfer. Here then 14.14 ma goes in and for the (lossless) reciprocal linear relationship to hold true that figure would be increased 6.8 fold to account for the resistive changes of the R value which would be a value of 96.15 ma. Now we go back to the clock analogies used to explain the results of the meters after the time distortion is factored in. With respect to the observation made by the source rate clock (as referenced as the input amperage in these twoexamples) each deviance of time is symmetrically either faster or slower.(from it's perspective). However with respect to the ending clocks for the contraction case the source appears twice its rate and for the expansion case the source appears to be at a rate 2/3 slower with respect to it's own increase calculated for unity power transfer. Where the plausible confusion comes in regarding making these comparisons is that initially an increase is applied against a decrease showing a 2/1 deviation from the linear case, and secondarily a (2/3) decrease is applied against an increase showing a two thirds deviation ( as a decrease compared to an increase for the first example) from the linear case, where now these comparisons are also shown as the fact that the amount of decrease from unity is not a reciprocal of the amount of increase of unity. Nevertheless the end comparison to explain the discrepancies from what should occur in unity power transfer to what actually occurs is that the clock showing the time elongation has a reference of reduction of an expansion by 2/3. This means in retrospect that the derived 96.15 ma (@ unity transfer) as a rate should be reduced 2/3 to 32 ma; well in agreement with the shown 31.9 ma. Essentially then I would suppose that since the forward and reverse cases shown here are explained as deviances from the normal reciprocal action in both directions of travel; these deviances can only be resolved by altering the acting time variable equivalency between those systems. Sincerely HDN
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/ On Sunday, February 10, 2019, 5:33:18 PM EST, Harvey Norris <harv...@yahoo.com> wrote: I've been watching Perry Mason episodes on cable tv, and decided to present my own mystery for consideration; but rest assured I have already deduced the solution to this mystery. As such I was wondering if anyone else besides myself could decipher the solution to this mystery, which is liked to negotiating a labyrinth maze to reach the ending. Two pieces of evidence are provided and their sources provided. Later deductions will be concluded from this case in evidence with further evidence leading to further deductions. HDNfwd operation @ 25 volts | | | | | | | | | | | fwd operation @ 25 volts Input and output measurements showing voltage and amperage readings for both sides of operation between a 12 lb... | | | bkwd operation comment @ 25 volts | | | | | | | | | | | bkwd operation comment @ 25 volts Now the reverse operation of sending 25 volts through the large 860 ohm coil to a 126 ohm coil, both balanced re... | | | Forward & Reverse Operations of 60hz Resonant Transformations. | | | | | | | | | | | Forward & Reverse Operations of 60hz Resonant Transformations. Fwd operation is from a 12 lb 23 gauge primary @ 126 ohms to a ~75 lb 23 gauge secondary @860 ohms. Amperage and... | | | Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
