Does the Keith Johnson model address POSITIVE charge carriers? It sounds like electrons were considered in his model—what about protons—in a surface plasmonic array in a line of nano particles, each supporting its own plasma.
Or maybe a surface plasma of paired electron---Cooper paired electrons where the charge is spread out over the volume of the pair, but magnetic moments are acting along a line with respective moments anti- parallel along that line. ( This may act like a composite BEC of zero spin, not affected by lattice resistance, being a surface feature.) https://phys.org/news/2019-01-evidence-superconductivity-room-temperature.html#nRlv https://phys.org/news/2014-06-superconducting-secrets-years.html#nRlv Bob Cook ----------------------------------- ________________________________ From: Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 4:20:55 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit I apologize for the bombast. I was the DoD designated scientist to investigate high Tc in 1987. After interviewing many top theoretical physicists I settled on MIT professor, Keith Johnson. He had developed a set of programs that evaluated all of the electron orbitals in a cluster of atoms. He could predict properties with a cluster of lessthan two dozen atoms. The predictive abilities were astounding and he told the audience at the 1983 Int. conference on SC in Zurich that they should examine the Perovskite minerals to increase Tc. Apparently, Alex Mueller (the conference chairman) listened and directed his colleague, Bednors to follow up. He did so. They won the Nobel Prize in 1987 and they are still clueless as to the mechanism. Keith Johnson retired from MIT in 1996. His formalism is known to a small number of scientists. ________________________________ From: John Berry <aethe...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 2:45 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit Thanks God! Good job we can dispense with the experimenting and theory, we just have to ask you! On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:12 AM Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com<mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com>> wrote: Room temp SC is impossible ________________________________ From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 11:25 PM To: vortex-l Subject: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit https://techlinkcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RTSC.pdf<https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftechlinkcenter.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F02%2FRTSC.pdf&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca44c3270134043abc10608d69bbe5cd6%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636867639237112098&sdata=OX%2Ff%2BDuKg70ZFqL4qOEub7tkjgngbrNXxPIqhbVKNKQ%3D&reserved=0> The Navy's patent application has been made public by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office describing a plasmonic based room-temperature superconductor capable of exhibiting superconductivity at temperatures of around 77 degrees Fahrenheit. Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html#jCp<https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fphys.org%2Fnews%2F2019-02-navy-patent-room-temperature-superconductor.html%23jCp&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca44c3270134043abc10608d69bbe5cd6%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636867639237122106&sdata=%2B2pCBkSQctc22lySAr3w6GoifbBCngIlD751LdxYtBc%3D&reserved=0>