I have been asking professional scientists how energy can be extracted from the vacuum and the best explanation I have received so far comes from Dr. Paul M. Sutter’s blog: ask a spaceman.
My question: Highlighted comment Axil Axil A photon/anti-photon pair created by pair creation through quantum fluctuations at the event horizon of a black hole produces Hawking radiation when the photon escapes to the far field and the anti-photon is absorbed into the black hole. How does that anti-photon decrease the energy content of the black hole to evaporate it since to the best of my understanding the anti-photon has positive energy…but negative frequency? Furthermore a photon with negative frequency and one with positive frequency are identical. Is the issue that allows the anti-photon to annihilate positive energy in any way related to the stoppage of time at the event horizon? Otherwise, the black hole just gets more energetic over time from this influx of anti-photons. Dr Sutter’s responce: Paul M. Sutter replied: "Great question! I've discussed this before - just search my channel for hawking radiation!" After my search, here it goes http://www.pmsutter.com/s hows/askaspaceman-archive/2016/9/20/aas-40-do-black-holes-d ie#comments-outer-wrapper Essentially, because the black hole traps virtual photons in a time event that stops time at the instant that the event horizon is formed, these trapped photons escape based on their position that they were at relative to the event horizon when that horizon first formed. The key concept about the Hawking radiation based energy productivity of an electromagnetic analog black hole is its lifetime. The shorter that this type of black hole lasts, the more vacuum energy that it can extract from the vacuum. The following insight comes from the explanation about the way Hawking radiation is produced and behaves that Dr. Sutter has explained in the reference above. The polariton just exists for a few pico-seconds. When the polariton forms in the dark mode on the surface of the ultra dense hydrogen, it surrounds an aggregation of vacuum perturbations: (aka virtual particle) and stores them for release based on a general relativity time distorted horizon that delays the release of those “photons” until the polariton decays. When the polariton decays, the time distortion goes away and the photons derived from the vacuum become real. The reason that the polariton can produce so much photon based vacuum energy is because it is so small and so short lived. Two types of vacuum perturbed photons come from the vacuum, the positive energy photons that are low frequency heat guys, and negative energy ones that have a negative frequency whose energy level is in the ultraviolet energy range. The polariton condensate holds onto the negative gravity property of the negative photons that are being constantly created by the roiling soup of polaritons aggregation almost instantaneous birth and deaths within the Bose condensate were each member of the aggregation lives and dies in pico-seconds, and the positive photons that are released to the far field as heat and light. The storage of negative energy inside the condensate results in its experimentally observed negative mass behavior. The bigger the polaritons get… meaning the polaritons store more negative energy, the longer they live but because of the polariton’s increase size(energy content) and longer lifetimes, they produce and release less vacuum energy…they essentially go to sleep. These sleeping polaritons wake up when they are pumped and new short lived polariton start the vacuum energy extraction cycle again. Dr Sutter laments that this Hacking radiation stuff is four levels of hard to understand. For the electromagnetic analog black hole, just double that level of hard. You can see that understanding LENR will take some considerable amount of time to become commonplace. On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 1:37 PM Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > A number of recent papers are turning up on Google Scholar which fill in > the theoretical gaps and broaden Holmlid's work with laser irradiation of > dense hydrogen. > > This one will be of interest to a few here... OK... maybe only Axil and > Bob Cook since it is pushing the limits. Apparently, the main premise is a > version of the "Einstein Ring" around nucleons. Normally this is a large > scale phenomenon of gravitational lensing. If transposed to quantum > gravity, a virtual "black hole" becomes an operative black hole that exists > temporarily as a result of a quantum fluctuation of spacetime. It can > induce proton disintegration. > > Anyway, even if you grow mentally numb at the mention of nano black holes, > the important point is that the Holmlid niche is drawing significant and > well reasoned interest from theoreticians around the World - at least the > ones with tenure or who have retired. > > Here is the citation - there are several others. IMHO this is the most > interesting thing happening in the field of LENR... by a mile. > > "Electrons Ejected Due of Laser Irradiation of Deuterons Layer on Metals > Surface -A New Source of Instant Electrical Energy" by Stefan Mehedinteanu > > https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01319725v3 >
