Axil When do you start to understand that for fusion you need to remove
energy not to add it!!?? (Forget your SM past as its mostly fringe science.)
Key is to find a path for efficient heat dissipation and first to induce
the H*/D* shrinked state. I wait for somebody measuring the 3.5x keV so
called dark matter signal as a result of condensation.
Jürg
On 24.06.2019 02:30, Axil Axil wrote:
Dear Bob.
Yes, I beleive that the energy produced bu LENR via Bose condensation
is derived from the vacuum.
Some videos of LION reactor experimental results have produced a
unique insignt in how the LENR reaction works. It involves the
mechanisms of black holes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqAqhp2uR7k
LION 2 - Diamond mining analysis overview
At 13:58 of the video, Bob begins to look at diapad micro diamond
erosion cause by the LENR active agent.
The hexagon cavity was apparently excavated by a dual triangular or
composite hexagon flux tube. The carbon ball was the residue of the
matter carried in the flux tube in the form of a quark based soup via
quantum mechanical superposition. The crystal structure of the carrier
of the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) based Bose condensate was most
probably hexagonal in its crystal organization. The triangle shape is
one half of the hexagon that corresponds to one of the handedness spin
emitters of the flux tube. In this formulation, the hexagon carries
both handedness portions of the flux tube emitters, one triangle of
the hexagon for the right handedness spins and the other half portion
of the hexagon for the left handedness spins of the flux tube.
The residue shapes left in the cavities produced by the flux tubes
will assume a spherical shape since the sphere is the shape that a
condinsate will always assume.
For a given volume, the object with the smallest surface area (and
therefore with the smallest surface area to volume ratio is the
sphere, a consequence of the isoperimetric inequality in 3 dimensions.
At 16:20 of the video, Bob describes the "miners".
These miners are probably */_crystals of ultra dense deutrium_/* that
are carrying a SPP BEC on its serface. These crystals have a hexagon
crystal structure. The Ultra dense hydrogen gives the SPP BEC mobility
since Ultra dense hydrogen is superfluidic and will find the smallest
hole in the material to flow through. The Ultra dense hydrogen will
follow any fractures or flaws in the diamond crystal.
At 19:14 of the video, Bob looks at the back-scatter image of the
erosion. What this analysis shows is how the miners will deposit their
store of flux tube suspended quarks */when the flux tubes are
terminated/*. The quarks that have been stored will consolidate into
elements that bear no relationship to the source of the stored quark
population. The disposition in the excavated cavity of the transmuted
element marked the termination point of the miners route of travel
when the flux tube terminates.
The freeze out of a quark soup carried by the flux tubes has nothing
to do with temperature. The products of this quark consolidation
process is random where the resulted transmuted element is uncontrolled.
It is conceivable that all the BECs form a aggravate membership of a
global BEC. In this coherent environment all the miners will do the
same thing since they are essentially acting as a single "super"
miner. The element produced by all the miners will be the same element
as seen in the SEM for the three elements: calcium, silicon and
aluminum which mark three separate LENR activation episodes.
The direction in which the miners move is a function of the flaws in
the diamond crystal. The Ultra dense hydrogen is formed in the flaws
in the diamond crystal. The miners will begin their activity in these
flaws and eat outward in a direction defined by the orientation of
their formation. This orientation is essentially random.
I have been asking professional scientists how energy can be extracted
from the vacuum and the best explanation I have received so far comes
from Dr. Paul M. Sutter’s blog: ask a spaceman.
Here it goes
http://www.pmsutter.com/shows/askaspaceman-archive/2016/9/20/aas-40-do-black-holes-die#comments-outer-wrapper
The key concept about the Hawking radiation based energy productivity
of an electromagnetic analog black hole is its lifetime. The shorter
that this type of black hole lasts, the more vacuum energy that it can
extract from the vacuum. The following insight comes from the
explanation about the way Hawking radiation is produced and behaves
that Dr. Sutter has explained in the reference above.
The polariton just exists for a few pico-seconds. When the polariton
forms in the dark mode, it surrounds an aggregation of vacuum
perturbations: (aka virtual particle) and stores them for release
based on a general relativity time distorted horizon that delays the
release of those “photons” until the polariton decays. When the
polariton decays, the time distortion goes away and the photons
derived from the vacuum become real.
The reason that the polariton can produce so much photon based vacuum
energy is because it is so small and short lived. Two types of vacuum
perturbed photons come from the vacuum, the positive energy photons
that are low frequency heat guys, and negative energy ones that have a
negative frequency whose energy level is in the ultraviolet energy
range. The polariton condensate holds onto the negative gravity
property of the negative photons that are being constantly created by
the roiling soup of polaritons aggregation almost instantaneous birth
and deaths within the Bose condensate were each member of the
aggregation lives and dies in pico-seconds, and the positive photons
that are released to the far field as heat. The storage of negative
energy inside the condensate results in its experimentally observed
negative mass behavior.
The bigger the polaritons get… meaning the polaritons store more
negative energy, the longer they live but because of the polariton’s
increase size(energy content) and longer lifetimes, they produce and
release less vacuum energy…they essentially go to sleep. These
sleeping polaritons wake up when they are pumped and new short lived
polariton start the vacuum energy extraction cycle again.
Dr Sutter laments that this Hacking radiation stuff is four levels of
hard to understand. For the electromagnetic analog black hole, just
double that level of hard. You can see that understanding LENR will
take some considerable amount of time to become commonplace.
The LENR speed limit... When the LENR reaction is active, the energy
and particles that it produces are not constrained by any walls nor
containment because they are in superposition. These energy and
particle emissions pass unencumbered through matter. Matter and energy
in this state of superposition are not connected to this reality while
the LENR reaction is active. But when the LENR reaction completes,
then the emissions that had been produced will manifest at a location
in space/time where it would have been if the emission was traveling
through a vacuum. For example, if the LENR reaction was active for one
second, then the energy that it produced would have traveled at the
speed of light for 300,000 kilometers. The energy that the LENR
reaction generates is manifest at the instant when the LENR reaction
initially activates. The transmutation of elements occurs immediately
when the LENR reaction first begins. The energy that the LENR reaction
derives from that transmutation is broadcast at the speed of light in
all directions in a spherical distribution even if that emission
passes through the entire mass of the earth. When the LENR reaction
terminates, then the broadcast of energy actualizes at a distance from
its point of origin defined by the speed of light and the time that
the LENR reaction was active. A basic primary simplex LENR reaction
generated by a polariton lasts for between 1 and 10 picoseconds. In
that time, the energy that this reaction produces travels between .03
and .3 centimeters. Emissions produced by strange radiation as it
excavates grooves, ruts, and holes in matter, will be teleported many
millions of kilometers while the Strange radiation is active. The
energy emissions derived from the matter that the strange radiation
plasmoid decomposes as it travels along a surface might provide a
country the size of Great Britain its total energy output for a year
based on E=Mc2
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 7:55 PM [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Axil-
It seems that you consider the source of energy creating the BEC
is the vacuum. That vacuum energy is then stored by the “pumping”
phenomena you suggest to “bring the BEC to life and then release
the energy as EM radiation in the bosenova.
Note that I have assumed the vacuum as the source of energy.
However, you may may consider a different source of energy
feeding the BEC’s. For example. the source could be the
condensation of single electrons into Cooper pairs with 0 spin
and 2 electron charges with the original spin energy of the 2
paired electrons the energy source.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>
for Windows 10
*From: *Axil Axil <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *Sunday, June 23, 2019 11:39 AM
*To: *vortex-l <mailto:[email protected]> *ubject: *Re:
[Vo]:Mizuno presentation at ICCF-21
I believe that a steady state LENR reaction does not produce
energy, but a flickering reaction does. This is why lowering the
gas pressure to almost nothing reveals the energy that LENR is
producing. This goes back to my beleive that transmutation does
not produce any meaningful LENR energy in the real world.
This belief is predicated on the assumption that the energy from
LENR comes from a Bose condensate of plasmom based polaritons.
When the Bose condensate is steady, it does not release energy,
but when it flickers, then energy is released when it dies and
later comes back to life. Think a florescent light operating at
marginal voltage.
The application of cyclic pumping is the best method to produce
energy from the LENR reaction. The higher the pumping frequency,
the more energy that will be released. A low gas pressure puts the
Bose condensate of plasmon polaritons on the "edge of survival"
when repeated terminations of the BEC produces repeated Bosenova
releases of energy. The "edge of survival" means that the density
of polaritons is right at the critical density needed for a Bose
condensate to form.
A high frequency RF pumping signal will also produce high
frequency energy release from the Bose condensate. Using heat to
pump the LENR reaction cannot easily produce a high frequency
cyclic Bose condensate life/death cycle.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 2:11 PM JonesBeene <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Can surface plasmons couple with dense hydrogen accumulating
in nano cracks - in order to form large clusters of bosons at
warm temperatures ? The cluster would contain many bound
bosons (deuterium) in a condensed state. In effect, it is a
“warm BEC”. If so then there is an instant route to thermal
anomalies – far exceeding the limits of chemistry, but without
nuclear fusion or nuclear decay.
Dozens of researchers in LENR have hypothesized that clusters
of atoms are the key to energy gain. There are papers going
back to the 1950s on pycnonuclear reactions in liquid
deuterium but they did not realize then that with proper
interfacial conditions, densification could happen at ambient
or warm temperatures. Later - but still over twenty years ago,
Arata & Zhang popularized the dense hydrogen cluster – aka
pycno - as a predecessor of nuclear fusion.
Fast forward while looking for a methodology (one with fewer
miracles than actual thermonuclear fusion) and a clear
alternative pathway arises. The sudden reversal of the dense
state in an explosion would be one promising way to explain a
thermal anomaly without the actual fusion. In such a reaction
the active modality is a Coulomb explosion of the dense cluster.
Excess energy would derive from the binding energy of the
cluster being release suddenly. There is, in fact, evidence
that the signature of this Coulomb explosion is radiation at
630 eV. Mizuno has mentioned this also but it is not his
preferred modality for gain.
If we accept the premise of hydrogen densification into
redundant ground states, as originally promoted by Mills or as
refined by Holmlid and formalized by Meulenberg et al via the
Dirac equation - then the mystery of excess heat can be
pinpointed to the nature of the binding energy of the dense
species into clusters.
Where did that energy gain originate? Can the Casimir force at
a few nanometers be a relevant factor in cluster formation?
This alternative explanation is a work in progress but
fortunately there is a trove of information coming from the
early days of semiconductor manufacturing with emphasis on
surface plasmons.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0038109882908924
“Surface plasmon attenuation by thin film overlayers in the
far infrared”
1980 Stegeman and Seymour
Absorption of surface plasmons in “metal–cladding
layer–air” structure at terahertz frequencies
<https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350449506000259>
Zhizhin, Nikitin, Bogomolov 2006 “Absorption of surface
plasmons (SP) guided by metal surface covered with a
transparent layer (“cladding layer”) at terahertz frequencies
has been studied both experimentally and
by computer simulations. It was found that presence of the
very thin layer increases SP absorption …”
These early papers can be interpreted as making the case for a
process where far Infrared radiation is actually powering the
Casimir compression of hydrogen into dense clusters. Once
compressed, perhaps QCD dynamics provide the “glue” which bind
the cluster.
As for gain - at some point the cluster becomes destabilized
and the Coulomb explosion follows. The glue (perhaps a pseudo
gluon) massive and that mass in converted to energy in the
Coulomb explosion.
This all fits together without the first miracle of nuclear
fusion and the second miracle of a new kind of gamma-free
fusion – by substituting the alternative miracle of QCD
(strong force) pseudo-gluons.
An evolving hypothesis like this may not hold up over time but at
least for now - it wins the battle of conservation of miracles… <g>
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06