Given there is conflicting information floating around concerning the relative 
hardness of nickel vs palladium - perhaps more attention should be directed to 
this detail.
Apparently all of the direct comparisons agree that nickel is indeed softer 
than palladium unless it has been work hardened (as when it is drawn into 
wire). It is indeed drawn into wire to make mesh, normally so it should be 
harder than Pd... end of story.

Catch-22 when drawn nickel is to be woven to make the wire mesh then it is 
almost always first annealed as it is too hard to weave, otherwise. When 
annealed it is softer. 

Opps. Nickel does not re-harden after a heat treatment and quench so the normal 
mesh should, on paper, be too soft for burnishing with Pd. In short - it should 
NOT be possible to use a palladium rod to coat nickel mesh unless the nickel 
has been work hardened, which it has been in order to make wire - BUT when wire 
is woven into mesh it is most often but not always annealed to make it softer. 
So the bottom line is that nickel wire must hardened and not annealed in order 
to coat it and yet this detail is not mentioned... yet there is more. 

One exception to this hardness issue would be if the rod being used to apply 
the Pd was made from J-M Type A palladium, which is considerably softer than 
pure. I double checked and nowhere could I find the composition of the 
palladium rod. There are several relevant papers and I may have missed it. Does 
anyone know?

BTW - Some of this detail about Type A goes back a decade or more to when BARC 
in India discovered that the alloy used in palladium filters (which is Type A) 
was testing dramatically better at excess heat than pure Pd. Later in France 
IIRC, Type A was used for the hero results. Normally it would be specified by 
anyone following P&F protocol.

Prior to BARC, it was thought that Silver prevents full deuterium loading, but 
there is scant evidence for that, and anyway - in the new Mizuno technique, 
high loading is to be avoided so it makes sense that the rod would be Type A or 
else the nickel was not annealed before weaving.

Given the cost of palladium these days, I suspect it could be a rod that Mizuno 
has owned for some time and he may not have been fully aware that it was Type A 
alloy.
Hopefully Jed will have the answer to this ...


Reply via email to