This is not exactly a “replication” at least in qualitative terms -  in that 
the gain relative to the input power is tiny.

Based on Mizuno’s claimed results, many observers were looking a replication 
characterized by long periods of ~300 watt excess as opposed to short periods 
at  very low COP


Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 11:09 AM
To: Vortex
Subject: [Vo]:Replication of Mizuno mesh experiment by Zhang

I am pleased to report a replication of Mizuno's experiment by H. Zhang:

https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ZhangHreproducti.pdf

Excess heat started at ~4 W and has now reached 9.6 W. Be careful when 
comparing this to the original experiment, because the mass of nickel mesh is 
smaller.

The calorimetry is MUCH better than Mizuno's. It is splendid.

Mizuno expressed some reservations about these results because the heat peters 
out after 2 or 3 hours. He thinks this might be caused by "impure gas in the 
reactants or slight differences in nickel." I do not think this is a problem 
because:
1. Zhang ran several times with a mesh that produced no heat (p. 18).
2. I think the total heat release is too large to be explained as impure gas.
3. The reaction is getting stronger between the second and third runs, from 4 W 
20 kJ up to 9.7 W 47 kJ. If this were caused by gas coming out of the nickel 
mesh, I suppose it would fade away. He does not open the cell or change the 
mesh between runs.
4. Zhang replaced the deuterium gas with argon. That killed the reaction. I 
hope he did not clobber it permanently! Yesterday he told me he went back to 
deuterium, but it is still dead.

Reply via email to